Talk:Communist Party USA (Marxist–Leninist)

Party Name Similarity

Is this the same organization as the one described in Communist Party (Marxist-Leninist) (USA)? They sound very similar: American, "Marxist-Leninist", and Maoist, but the dates don't quite match. --Saforrest (talk) 03:20, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

The founding dates for the two distinct organizations fail to match by 12 years; 1965 for the Communist Party USA (Marxist-Leninist) founded as a splinter from the CPUSA [Communist Party USA]and 1977 for the Communist Party (Marxist-Leninist) [or CPML] founded through the October League. The "Communist Party USA (Marxist-Leninist)" did not last long enough to overlap in time with the "Communist Party (Marxist-Leninist)". Neither "USA" or "(USA)" were part of the name of the "Communist Party (Marxist-Leninist)". Differences between the two go far beyond the founding dates. Neonorange (talk) 23:41, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Communist Party USA (Marxist–Leninist). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721182135/http://marxists.anu.edu.au/history/erol/periodicals/red-flag/index.htm to http://marxists.anu.edu.au/history/erol/periodicals/red-flag/index.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:46, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

didion’s article

I really don’t see the justification for removing mention of her article. The name of the party is right there in the title! It’s about laski in his capacity as leader of the cpusa(ml). A significant piece of the party’s history, almost the only thing that makes them notable actually. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Laski22 (talk • contribs) 03:02, 30 July 2022 (UTC)