This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Urban studies and planning, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Urban studies and planning on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Urban studies and planningWikipedia:WikiProject Urban studies and planningTemplate:WikiProject Urban studies and planningUrban studies and planning articles
At some point I hope to read this book, but I'll start by reviewing the article. Things look good at first glance – I'll update the {{GAProgress}} below as I review, and leave notes for each section under the "Notes" heading below that. I'm looking forward to collaborating with you, czar! ezlev (user/tlk/ctrbs) 00:55, 27 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
Totally up to you, but I think some subheadings could make this section a bit easier to read. Maybe one for the first half and one for the second, with the first paragraph left as-is under the main heading?
Usually I avoid single paragraph sections, as they can often be left without a header with no detriment to the reader. I'd consider leaving the first two paragraphs and adding a "Goodman paradigms" heading to split the section but generally I'm not sure it'll add much unless I expand further. I considered numbering the three paragraphs that each outline a Goodman paradigm (like a list) but that felt like overkill. czar13:19, 1 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
Why is "in the Le Corbusier sketch style" commented out?
Wasn't sure if it was a prominent opinion or just trivia. If no other review mentions it, I'd likely exclude it. czar13:19, 1 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
"the authors, as New Yorkers, are dismissive of cultures unlike the megacity's" – this seems like a big detail. Is it mentioned anywhere else? Could it be elaborated on a bit?
Which part: general New Yorker chauvinism or how it played a role in the book? There are other refs that discuss Paul Goodman's self-identification with New York City but none of the other reviews/sources I've read have discussed this detail as a major role in the book besides what Widmer mentioned. czar13:19, 1 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
Last section first - it looks like Ellerby 1962 and Stoehr 2001 are in the references but not cited in the article. Can those be removed, or moved to a further reading section?
