Talk:Community of Royalist People's Party

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Community of Royalist People's Party/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Midnightblueowl (talk · contribs) 16:41, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

I'll take this one on. Looks like there's been a lot of good work here thus far. Midnightblueowl (talk) 16:41, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

It's great to see that web sources have been archived (far few editors actually bother to do this), but why are a number of the sources omitted from this process? Although not a requirement for GA status, it would be ideal to see all of the web sources properly archived. Midnightblueowl (talk) 17:14, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

I was Webcit-ing little by little. All done. Mr Tan (talk) 14:24, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Can we get citations to bolster the infobox claims that the party was centre-right, nationalistic, and Sihanoukist? Midnightblueowl (talk) 17:29, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Fixed. Cited source quotes him saying "I want to mobilize nationalism and Sihanoukism to form my party and restore the royal family" as he announced plans to form CRPP. Mr Tan (talk) 14:24, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

I think that it would be worth providing an additional sentence giving a little background to Ranariddh's split from FUNCINPEC in that opening sentence in the "History" section. Midnightblueowl (talk) 18:54, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

I think a passing mention in the form a phrase will suffice, added in after checking with citation #1. Mr Tan (talk) 14:10, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Logo section

• "party logo has". Should this not be "had"? Midnightblueowl (talk)

Fixed Mr Tan (talk) 14:10, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

• "Brahman tradition". Can this be clarified. Would it be better to say "Hindu belief"? Midnightblueowl (talk) 17:06, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

The source states: "The logo also includes the number 9, which represents power in Brahman tradition, and is surrounded by yellow, white and green circles, which represent the monarchy, peace and water, respectively." Mr Tan (talk) 14:10, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

You are right about the source, but I believe that what is meant is not in fact Brahman, but Brahmin. Thus I would recommend changing this to "Brahmin tradition". Would that be okay with you, Mr Tan? Midnightblueowl (talk) 11:47, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

I've made the change myself. Midnightblueowl (talk) 11:49, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

• "three circles in the yellow, white and green colours, which represents the monarchy, peace and water respectively". This wording could be improved. "Around the logo were three circles; one was yellow, representing the monarchy, another was white, representing peace, and the third was green, representing water"? Midnightblueowl (talk) 17:06, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Fixed Mr Tan (talk) 14:10, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

• "When Ranariddh returned to FUNCINPEC in January 2015, the party adopted a new party logo that has a similar design inspired from CRPP's party logo" Again, the prose could be improved here. "On Ranariddh's return to the party in January 2015, FUNCINPEC adopted a new logo that was inspired by that of the defunct CRPP" would read more smoothly, for instance. Midnightblueowl (talk) 17:06, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Fixed Mr Tan (talk) 14:10, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

I'm happy to pass this now. Congratulations, Mr Tan! Midnightblueowl (talk) 11:49, 15 March 2016 (UTC)