Talk:Comox-Strathcona Regional District

Not sure about the demotion, sort of...

The reason I say that is because if it's the case this RD is now split, its successor articles are high priority, and this one should say what those are in the paragraph saying it was being done away with/split. And to me, even unwritten defunct regional district articles should be mid importance; I was raised in the long-standing Dewdney-Alouette Regional District - which had existed so long that "Dewdney-Alouette" became the operative name for the region north of the Fraser and east of the Pitt, to Lake Errock and Chehalis; there's really no other for the north bank of the Fraser, in fact. Anyway, it and others all need articles, and as hstorical items they are mid importance. Another consideration with shifting/splitting RDs is all the articles currently linked to this one need to be revised, whether for category or content; so while this article itself is not as high or even mid priority as its successors, there's still heaps of work to do as a result of its partition.. The importance rating is fine, I guess; just seems a bit hasty.Skookum1 (talk) 03:16, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Historical census area?

How can a jurisdiction founded only in the later 20th Century be "historical" as a census area. Is it not currently a census area?Skookum1 (talk) 15:55, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Put the census division cat back in, though still ahve my doubts even though the RD has been partitioned and "now there are two".....the reason I'm undecided is that there has been no use of the new RDs as census divisions yet; this one is still the current census division, and will remain so AFAIK until the 2011 census. Or have the new RDs already been designated as census divisions?Skookum1 (talk) 16:53, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Comox-Strathcona Regional District. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050305011701/http://www.rdcs.bc.ca/ to http://www.rdcs.bc.ca/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:10, 11 August 2017 (UTC)