Talk:Companies House

Untitled

Should Companies House be spelt with an apostrophe, "Companies' House"? If not, what gramatical rule applies?

While there may be a grammatical rule that is being broken, we report usage as provided by the organisation, and so no apostrophe is used. Noisy | Talk 11:05, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Free Access to Companies House Data

Companies House only provides a small subset of data for free to the public. Information about company directors (as highlighted in the research noted in the article) can only be accessed after opening a commercial account with CH, and paying an access fee for every record.

http://www.companieshouse.gov.uk/toolsToHelp/WCInfo.shtml

The cost of this research precludes the sort of non-commercial financial research which occurs in the United States; research that is enabled by the SEC's policy of sharing data wholesale to the public.

http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1005678

http://business.nd.edu/Study_of_Financial_Regulation/Newsletters/Winter_2011-Issue_NO_4/Using_Textual_Analysis_to_Uncover_Fraud/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.73.10.134 (talk) 17:17, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

1844

What happened in 1844? Presumably before then you needed a charter to form a company and that was when the current system whereby anyone can make one was bruoght in? Morwen - Talk 21:02, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

I'll head out and get a photo of Companies House Cardiff when I can 81.106.129.49 15:15, 23 August 2007 (UTC) See Joint Stock Companies Act 1844. Twrw 20:50, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

I was looking for a list of the oldest surviving companies - anyone know of a list online of companies from 1844 onwards that still exist? Oldest I've found so far is 1913, but I'm sure there are others.83.148.147.99 09:00, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Links

Is it really appropriate to link to various formation agents on this page?83.148.147.99 09:00, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

NO, it is not. I've removed those which have returned (yet again). 218.111.148.233 08:16, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Sock Puppeting from CompaniesHouse.gov.uk

(cur | prev) 11:48, 29 January 2010‎ 194.75.36.157 (talk)‎ . . (12,496 bytes) (+181)‎ . . (→‎Criticisms: Update in response to this criticism.) (undo)

(cur | prev) 13:48, 19 January 2010‎ 62.254.241.114 (talk)‎ . . (12,315 bytes) (-1,086)‎ . . (Removal of section from 'Criticism' and updating intoductory information to indicate that Companies House does now have a 24/7 e-filing service in key areas, therfore invaldating the criticism..) (undo)

lp.companieshouse.gov.uk. 300 IN A 62.254.241.101

lp.companieshouse.gov.uk. 300 IN A 194.75.36.170

You must have been searching a long way back to find this, but whatever else it might be it isn't sock puppetry, just a conflict of interest. — Blue-Haired Lawyer ^t 23:14, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Taylor & Sons liquidation

Need a section on this incident? http://www.theguardian.com/law/shortcuts/2015/jan/28/typo-how-one-mistake-killed-a-family-business-taylor-and-sons Casey (talk) 14:56, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Companies House. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081012111500/http://www.companieshouse.gov.uk/about/gbhtml/gbf1.shtml to http://www.companieshouse.gov.uk/about/gbhtml/gbf1.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:35, 11 August 2017 (UTC)