Talk:Company (2002 film)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ssven2 (talk · contribs) 14:28, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

I will review this article. Thank you.  — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 14:28, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

• This is a gangster film as opposed to being just a crime film.
• "tension arises" — Should be "tensions arise"
• "after a meeting with a man named Haneef" — Can be rephrased as "after meeting a man named Haneef"
• "Malik and Chandu kill Saeed and his brother Anis in the rear seat of a car." — Elaborate on who Saeed is to let readers know why Malik and Chandu killed him and Anis.
• "His rival gang leader and colleague under Aslam's umbrella Sharma, who was in a meeting with police inspector Rathod, is killed." — Who is Aslam and who was the cast member who played him? If he's not that important, remove him from the sentence altogether.
• Wikilink Home Minister.
• "Haneef was shot dead a few months after Varma met him" — Did it impact the film in anyway? If not, it seems unnecessary and can be removed.
• "He later met several crime reporters, police officers and associates of gangsters" — Regarding the film? if so, state that in the sentence.
• What did Varma mean by "profound-sounding"?
• Of course, wikilink the references on the first instance of them being mentioned.

That's about it from me. Resolve these comments, Yashthepunisher and the article will be promoted.  — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 10:53, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

Ssven2 All done. Thanks for the review. Yashthepunisher (talk) 20:11, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. Has an appropriate reference section:

   B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall: Passed, my queries were met and solved by the nominator.

   Pass or Fail:

Thank you for addressing my comments, Yashthepunisher. Congratulations, the article has passed.  — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 04:08, 4 May 2019 (UTC)