Talk:Company of Mission Priests
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
Notability
editIs a group of around 50 anglican clergy really notable?? Mayalld (talk) 12:32, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
- I'm not really sure what the applicable guideline for this would be. There may be a realtively small number of current members, but they have a reasonalbe history (the rediscovery of the Religious Life in Anglicanism is still a fairly recent phenomenon). They are officially recognised by the Anglican Communion and the Vincentians, so I don't see why not. David Underdown (talk) 16:45, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
- Most religious orders today in Anglican Communion have far less members than 50. That can't be any criterion for notability. (Terot (talk) 19:53, 19 August 2008 (UTC))
The external links establish notability. -- Secisek (talk) 06:17, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Company of Mission Priests. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080605173918/http://www.brandonparish.org.uk/Company%20of%20Mission%20Priests.htm to http://www.brandonparish.org.uk/Company%20of%20Mission%20Priests.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:48, 11 August 2017 (UTC)