Talk:Comparative law/Archive 1

Archive 1

Introduction to America is not correct

There is a brief subsection in the article's History section entitled Birth as a discipline in the U.S. which describes it as Rudolf Schlesinger's professorial appointment to Cornell in 1948.

I propose that this subsection be removed for a couple of reasons. Most importantly, the "fact" stated under its heading is incorrect. The Annual Bulletin of the Comparative Law Bureau included in its mandate academic research in this topic. It was published regularly in the USA by the American Bar Association from 1908 (one year before before Rudolf Schlesinger was born). On this topic, David S. Clark (President of the American Society of Comparative Law) stated that "Sustained scholarly activity commenced in 1904" . Furthermore, it seems rather parochial to provide the mechanism and background of the discipline's introduction to only one country (even if it were corrected). The subject did not profoundly change due to its American arrival from France at the beginning of the 20th century. Wikipedia is not limited to an American viewpoint. Of course I am glad that Rudolf Schlesinger escaped the horrors of Nazi Germany (he was Jewish and half-American). I certainly recognize and do not wish to minimize his considerable contribution to this field, but it was taught at 25 American University Colleges of Law before he started teaching.
ChrisJBenson (talk) 07:22, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

References

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Comparative law. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100130093740/http://www.iuscomparatum.org:80/AIDC to http://www.iuscomparatum.org/AIDC

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:48, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Untitled

It would be useful to have more information on this.

Espec different methods of Comparative Law. By... Wednesday please. That's when the essays due in...

• Exactly this (and yes, essay is due on Wednesday too - really :P). I might take a look once the essay is done. Eionm 03:48, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

---

removed this: (French: droit comparé, German: Rechtsvergleichung, Italian: diritto comparato, Spanish: derecho comparado, Portuguese: direito comparado, Greek: Συγκριτικό Δίκαιο)

For purposes of cleanup. This information should/is accessible via interwiki links. --84.50.72.7 18:08, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

• I removed the cleanup tag, as it seems pretty good now. I also renamed the section for external links. Bearian 21:17, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

I was left with the question of, if you find yourself out of information on your report, what are some steps you can take to help you find information?

````. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marlee Gaddy (talk • contribs) 20:14, 5 October 2020 (UTC)