Talk:Comparative law wiki

Salvageable?

I am struggling to find much to salvage in this article. A decade on from its creation, this reads like a well-intentioned effort to make something happen that did not, in fact, happen. None of the three cited sources is adequate to support articleworthiness: one is about comparative law editing on Wikipedia, with just a glancing mention of Wex and JurisPedia; one is an article about the value of wikis in the law, but with no mention of comparative law; and the remaining one is just a bare link to a mentioned website. A web search does not give me much confidence that there's much more out there from reliable sources. I wonder, however, if this might be salvageable by rescoping to something like Wikis and law along the lines of Wikis and education; at that point these cited sources (and others) would become relevant, but the article would still have to be rewritten, pretty much from scratch. -- Visviva (talk) 00:55, 27 October 2024 (UTC)

Yeah, legal wikis, law wikis or wikis and the law would be a much better scope and title than what we have now. I imagine wikis and education works better in that context because education will have a much more two-way-street relationship.

Whether you want to WP:BLOWITUP or not should depend on how much effort you want to put into rebuilding. At this point a rename and some minor rewrites would be fine in my book. — HTGS (talk) 02:31, 27 October 2024 (UTC)