Talk:Comparative physiology

General Improvement

I absolutely buy that this article needs expansion, but does anyone have any ideas on what direction it should go in? Yes, the "Societies" "journals" and huge (but nicely comprehensive and useful!) list of "further reading" sources all need to go. But what should everything be replaced with? I'm thinking that the "History" section needs to start a bit like it is, maybe have the Prosser stuff from the next section, go to New Directions (which, by the way, is probably where that "stamp collecting" criticism came from) and have important physiologists mentioned along the way. But that essentially leaves the article with one real section, the section on history. I think I need to go read other biological discipline pages, but I'm not really sure what this article should be about. Any ideas would be greatly appreciated. Enuja

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Comparative physiology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://archive.is/20050615133231/http://www.zoo.latrobe.edu.au/anzscpb/ to http://www.zoo.latrobe.edu.au/anzscpb/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070210060243/http://www.dukenews.duke.edu/2007/01/schmidt-nielsen.html to http://dukenews.duke.edu/2007/01/schmidt-nielsen.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:00, 11 August 2017 (UTC)