Talk:Comparison of issue-tracking systems

(Redirected from Talk:Comparison of issue tracking systems)
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Nemo bis in topic Changes for OpenProject

Mantis supports LDAP

edit

FYI, the Mantis Bug Tracker supports LDAP authentication. That's how my site uses it. Configuration is done via the config_inc.php file. Ours does LDAP lookups against a Netware server.

See LDAP for more information.

Team Foundation Server is not a bug tracker

edit

See Team Foundation Server. It is a source control system, with some feature for project tracking, but is not a "bug tracking system" per se. If you leave it included, the question of "does it integrate with source control" is strange, because it *is* one.

Table Omissions

edit

In order to be able to filter the table data to apply my own criteria, I loaded all the tables as of 12:00 15 June 2013 into an Excel spreadsheet. [Edit: updated on 4 December 2016]. This showed that, unsurprisingly, some tables are missing entries for some issue-tracking systems. I've updated the "General" table so that it has entries for all systems (just one was missing), and corrected some alphabetic ordering, but I just don't have time at the moment to create blank lines for all missing items. For posterity, the table below shows the entries currently missing for each of the tables, if someone wants to fix them.


Features Input interfaces Notification interfaces Revision control system integration Authentication methods
Bontq Bontq Bontq
GLPI
IBM Rational Team Concert IBM Rational Team Concert
Launchpad Launchpad Launchpad Launchpad
OpenProject OpenProject OpenProject OpenProject OpenProject
Tuleap Tuleap Tuleap Tuleap

Changes for OpenProject

edit

Hi, I am one of OpenProject's marketing managers. The information you seem to have on this page seems to be a bit outdated. May I ask you to review the following: Creator is OpenProject GmbH The code is published under GPL v3 Implementation language is Ruby on Rails, Angular and Type Script (remove JavaScript) Backend is only PostgreSQL Launched in 2012

If you wanted to integrate OpenProject in the features table, we would be very grateful and I can provide you with the following information:

Documentation integration/generation, reporting: Yes, reporting with customizable dashboard, cost and time reports, documentation with Wiki Test planning integration: Yes Customizable workflow: yes unicode support: yes custom fields: yes SLA: yes Plugin API: yes Multiple projects: yes full text search: yes indexed full text search: no indexed file search: yes edit conflict warning: no

Regarding input interfaces, this is the information for OpenProject: web: yes mobile: yes email: yes CLI: Partial, see note 2 GUI: no REST: yes SOAP: yes Mylyn: no Visual studio: no IntelliJ IDEA: no Others: no

Notification interfaces: email: yes Rss:no Atom: yes XMPP: no Twitter: no

revision control system integration: Git: yes Subversion: yes All others: no

Authentication methods: Form based: yes public key cryptography: no Two factor: yes OpenID: Google and Azure OAuth: yes LDAP: yes Shibboleth: no Others: SAML

Containers: Docker image: yes Helm Chart: no

Many thanks for your consideration.

Kind regards, Rebecca OpenProject (talk) 14:20, 5 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Do you have references for those statements? Also, I think you're supposed to use personal accounts, so for instance an username "Rebecca (OP)", or even better "Rebecca12345", as it's not generally allowed to make edits in an official capacity. See WP:ISU. Nemo 14:48, 5 May 2021 (UTC)Reply