Wikipedia

Talk:Comparison of open-source wireless drivers

Latest comment: 1 year ago by KDAM71 in topic Dead link
Learn more about this page

OS

edit
Latest comment: 18 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
  • mabe we could make an os comparison and add the os inside the projects but bsd like OS behave diferently

does any one has an idea on how to handle multiple OS

Maybe we could have different sections for each chipset and list the available drivers for each of them? dystopianray 02:28, 5 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
so we have 2 choices
or we see the os suport from a chipset
or we see what chipset suport an os
personaly i like trying os but most of the people does not and have only one OS
so mabe the most interesting thing is to show them wich chip is suported in their os
so mabe we will add some non free drivers but that must be discussed before...what do you think about adding MacOSX drivers?
Personaly i don't know(about the non free drivers)

00 tux(my point of views(for npov), howto customise a signature) | talk 07:00, 7 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

RE-moove

edit

we need to change open-source in free software because some licence such as apsl 1.0 aren't aceptable licences and are open-source and not free software for this reasons or mabe we could add non free drivers to the comparison and change the name(if it exist)

OpenHAL 4 linux

edit
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

why is the openHAL website dead? is openHAL dead and unmaintained?

There's more information about OpenHAL at http://madwifi.org/wiki/OpenHAL. Ceros 18:31, 6 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

I'm all for expanding opensource info...

edit
Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

However, these charts tend to be very biased to or against certain platforms, and are prone to be out of date as soon as people will agree upon terms and a layout long enough for it to stick. Just seems like a waste of time doing these big comparisons rather that keeping individual os pages containing this info up to date. I really do think the time and effort would be much more useful keeping up a master list of open source projects and then working to keep them up to date. One size does not fit all. Any author that knows a lot about one project isn't going to know a lot about the others and it just invites flames from people that disagree and generates tons of wasted posts on other related newsgroups which takes away from the image of Wikipedia in my opinion. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by M Scheliga (talk • contribs) .

I sort of agree with this. Comparison of operating systems is one thing, but this profusion of "Comparison of open source X" seems to be going a bit far, especially ones that are a bit ugly, poorly structured, easily go out of date, and are of minority interest. NicM 09:36, 13 June 2006 (UTC).Reply

firmwares and expert

edit
Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

http://kerneltrap.org/node/4118 why revert back:

  • false information such as atheros card that doesn't have a firmware
  • bad presentation...you must give 2 informations at once:
    • technical information about the firmware
    • the freeness of the firmware

the technical information can be divided in parts:

  • on-board firmware
  • loadable firmware
  • no firmware at all

the freeness include:

  • the distribution of the firmware if it is loadable
  • if there is free firmware such as freemac

example: remplace yes by:

  • no firmware
  • redistribuable loadable firmware
  • non-redistribuable loadable firmware
  • loadable firmware avaliable with a contract
  • on-board firmware

keep the (1) for the free firmware

if you want change {{Yes}} by {{but yes}} and {{No}} by {{but No}}

From the point of view of this page, I'm not sure why the difference between "no firmware" and "on-board firmware" is interesting; in both cases, "N/A" would seem to suffice, unless there's an issue of firmware updates from the vendor (i.e., you don't need to load the firmware at boot time, but you might need to load it on an update). Guy Harris 07:50, 18 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Deleted Text

edit
Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I have deleted the following text (added by User:00 tux). as it is inappropriate for an article page.

PLEASE REVERT CHANGES BEFORE THE MOOVE TO FREE FIRMWARE AND PLEASE USE TAKL PAGE(TO THE USER) REASON:FALSE INFORMATION AND PRESENTATION EXAMPLE OF FALSE IFORMATION:ATHEROS DOESN'T USE A FIRMWARE AT ALL!!!

LVC 22:29, 13 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

FreeBSD/NetBSD/OpenBSD

edit
Latest comment: 17 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Most BSDs have the very same drivers for the very same devices written by the very same people. These include ral, ural, ipw, iwi, wpi developed by Damien from OpenBSD; an, wi by Bill Paul from FreeBSD; atw, rtw by David Young from NetBSD. Obviously, these must be grouped together, and not duplicated three times on the very same page... MureninC 20:48, 18 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Then make a "BSD" section to replace the sections for all four (yes, four - don't forget DragonFly BSD) free-software BSDs. You could add back the "Operating System" column, but you might not want to lose the "Integration" information (which should perhaps indicate, for integrated drivers, which release first had them - so that column might have more than one item, one for each BSD in which it appears.
Note also that there should be driver capabilities sections for the other OSes, similar to the "Linux driver capabilities" section, and that some particular driver might have capabilities in one OS that it doesn't have in others (e.g., the FreeBSD Aironet driver isn't integrated with the 802.11 framework as are the NetBSD and, I think, OpenBSD drivers, but it supports monitor mode, unlike the NetBSD and OpenBSD Aironet drivers). Guy Harris 07:24, 18 September 2006 (UTC)Reply
I disagree strongly with the idea of having a unique BSD column, for the same driver, the status can be different for each BSD, as of 18/03/2007 for instance the 'ral' driver does not support the same chipsets on FreeBSD, NetBSD and OpenBSD. See the details ! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 213.129.227.99 (talk • contribs) 17:38, 17 March 2007 (UTC).Reply

Marvell Libertas 88W8388

edit

Seems like there's a new driver coming along for Linux. Marvell has joined the One Laptop Per Child project and Red Hat people seems to be working like crazy on the driver code Marvell released along with specs under NDA to Red Hat only.

Press release: http://www.marvell.com/press/pressNewsDisplay.do?releaseID=479 Press release: http://www.marvell.com/press/pressNewsDisplay.do?releaseID=557 Mailinglist: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/libertas-dev/ Git tree: http://git.infradead.org/?p=users/marcelo/libertas;a=summary

edit
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

there is 2 kind of drivers for the ralink cards on linux the rt2x00 that is a new and experimental driver rt 2400,rt2500,rt61 and rt73 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 85.27.13.176 (talk) 00:07, 8 January 2007 (UTC).Reply

edit

the name of the ralink card can be confusing,specialy when you find rt2600 with your lspci and you've got a driver named rt61

  • rt2400pci
  • rt2500pci
  • rt2500usb=rt2570
  • rt2600=rt61
    • rt2561
    • rt2561s
    • rt2661
  • rt73
    • rt2573
    • rt2671

Deviscape vs others

edit
Latest comment: 17 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

There are several stacks in linux we could add the stack used by the drivers

i have 2 examples:

  • rt2500 use a stack that is in the kernel
  • the rt2x00 use the deviscape stack

Could we add the stack of the driver?GNUtoo(my point of views(for npov), howto customise a signature) | talk 14:16, 1 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Yes, somebody could do so. Anybody who wants to could add it as a column, using Template:dunno, and then people who know which stack a particular driver uses could fill the column in. Guy Harris 18:43, 1 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Comment moved from main article

edit
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

[Please leave this comment on the talk page. It is not appropriate for the main article] Please cite sources for the others answer than no in for the firmware. See also the firmware section of the talk page for the migration from yes, no, N/A to a more informative version, example are in the talk page, atheros driver has been migrated. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Diego (talk • contribs) 16:05, 4 October 2007 (UTC)Reply


iwlwifi 802.11b network

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Not strictly about the artice, but the table list this as working, however I can't connect to my 802.11b only AP resulting in the access point resetting itself. There is also an open bug report noting people can't connect to theirs 802.11b AP's. Has anyone here had any luck getting it to connect to an 802.11b only AP? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.136.35.53 (talk) 12:59, 16 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

NetBSD outdated

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

NetBSD 5.0 was released just before OpenBSD 4.5 and FreeBSD 7.2. There are new driver: iwn(4) and zyd(4), but rum(4) that appeared in 4.0(?) is still missing here, too. I try to keep FreeBSD and OpenBSD current, but just do not follow NetBSD enough to fill in all entries. I wonder if I should copy the entries from OpenBSD or FreeBSD, as that is where the driers are ported from -- but if no one checks if the information really apply for NetBSD, it is not worse having entries with many question marks. The Linux entries are not always correct, either, since the documentation is not as good as for the BSD, but at least there is hope for people reading it and fixing mistakes. There are a few options for NetBSD, if no one editing this article is really interested in it: 1. Leave it as it is, since there is not claim of completeness. 2. Mark it as outdated. 3. Copy lines of missing drivers with properties from OpenBSD and mark properties with question marks. 4. Put in lines with just the names to indicate that there are drivers missing, but no one cared to research their properties in detail. 85.177.244.33 (talk) 17:15, 3 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Requested move

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Comparison of open source wireless drivers → Comparison of open-source wireless drivers — like Open-source software — Neustradamus (✉) 18:19, 14 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Discussion moved to Talk:List of free and open source software packages#Requested move. Jafeluv (talk) 16:01, 22 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Make tables sortable

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I would do it myself if only I could... 85.77.178.237 (talk) 07:49, 25 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

No Legend

edit
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

There is no legend explaining what the colors mean. What do the colors mean by the way? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pelliott11 (talk • contribs) 08:04, 29 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

VAP support

edit
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

would be nice to have information if a particular driver has VAP support which is necessary to have more than SSID per radio — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.1.54.62 (talk) 15:05, 25 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Comparison of open-source wireless drivers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:52, 29 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 27 external links on Comparison of open-source wireless drivers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:11, 19 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Content meant for talk moved from main article

edit
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Originally from "Driver capabilities" section:

Also see wireless.kernel.org

Please note: This sections needs to be split in softMAC and hardMAC drivers. All softMAC drivers should have the same capabilities regarding encryption, since it is done by hostapd.
Then we should copy/extend http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Drivers because it lists all the available modes of operation: http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Documentation/modes
Then we should think about documenting, whether a driver can support multiple modes simultaneously and which ones.

--Arzg (talk) 04:18, 24 April 2018 (UTC)Reply


How to find out what driver I am using?

edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

can we add some text to tell how to find out what driver a user is using? Jackzhp (talk) 17:00, 17 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

It looks like content of website wireless.kernel.org were moved to new domain wireless.wiki.kernel.org. Current links points to 404 pages. I'm going to replace all links http://wireless.kernel.org to https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org . --Alexey Vazhnov (talk) 14:20, 15 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Done. Probably some other changes should be done, like here. Does anybody want to do it? --Alexey Vazhnov (talk) 14:35, 15 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Add newer AKM support (WPA3 Personal, DPP)

edit
Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

WPA3 Personal (SAE) isn't listed in the tables as a column, but ought to be since there might be hardware dependencies on its support? Also ought to list DPP. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smithkennedy (talk • contribs) 18:15, 16 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I'm not familiar with this yet and have just the smallest issue.

The link at References 16 gets a html 404 error.


https://ipw2100.sourceforge.net/firmware.php?fid=2 KDAM71 (talk) 18:45, 28 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Comparison_of_open-source_wireless_drivers&oldid=1200662469"