Wikipedia

Talk:Comparison of sites using the LiveJournal codebase

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (January 2018)
Learn more about this page

Untitled

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Is BootyJournal really notable enough to be here? OpenWeblog is tiny also. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.206.86.190 (talk) 19:57, 30 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

BlogOnline closed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.110.172.20 (talk) 19:01, 16 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, I've moved it to the list of closed sites. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:28, 16 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

CommieJournal soon to move into the defunct category?

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

See: magyar_saman (September 13, 2009), "Sorry for this", CommieJournal News, archived from the original on 2009-09-13 (also, discussion at http://www.journalfen.net/community/fandom_lounge/956476.html). —David Eppstein (talk) 23:56, 13 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Dreamwidth seed accounts (permanent accounts)

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Per http://www.dreamwidth.org/support/faqbrowse.bml?faqid=4 (used as the reference for Dreamwidth account levels), they're not available ATM and likely never will be again. Also, that FAQ no longer mentions the $200 price. Given that, I think they should be marked as N/A (perhaps with a historical note), or if not, another reference used to support the "when they were available" $200 price. (Note: not making the correction myself due to possible conflict of interest from community project leader role on Dreamwidth) The Crab Who Played With The Sea (talk) 20:26, 5 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

crazylife down

edit
Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Crazylife seems to be down. Anyone know whether this is temporary or permanent? They seem to have disabled web-crawlers in 2007, so it's hard to tell whether anything's been updated there recently. —David Eppstein (talk) 02:04, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

I moved it to the table of defunct sites since it is still down months later. All the other sites in the active list are responding as of today, but openweblog is broken: it is returning the php source code of its pages rather than the correct html. Since it still exists and returns something, I'm going to assume this is a temporary glitch. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:18, 5 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Inksome

edit
Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Inksome is, as far as I can tell, now dead, so I moved it to the defunct category. 75.94.20.69 (talk) 00:53, 6 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Yes, given that its domain now just points to a placeholder, that seems like the right thing to do. I added a source, from Dreamwidth's News. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:38, 6 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

IziBlog not working/ParaJournal not listed

edit
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I don't think IziBlog works anymore and needs to be moved to the list of defunct journal sites. Also, I didn't noticed that ParaJournal was listed. It was very much of a LiveJournal clone, only I think it allowed 10 images... I can't fully remember. Very short-lived, only reason why I remembered it was that I mentioned it briefly in a really old Blurty entry. Believed ParaJournal died some time in 2002 or 2003. Sailorsaturn (talk) 01:35, 4 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

OpenWeblog invalid

edit
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Sorry, just checked out OpenWeblog and it seems to be a URL redirect to Hexmode.com which seems like an individual blog site that discusses Free Software, Orthodox Christianity, and more written by a Wikimedia user. The site itself is being powered by WordPress... hardly LiveJournal coding if you ask me. So unless the former OpenWeblog service has been moved to another domain name, you may want to move it to the defunct table as well. Sailorsaturn (talk) 05:48, 4 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Comparison of sites using the LiveJournal codebase. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:21, 29 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 29 external links on Comparison of sites using the LiveJournal codebase. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:14, 5 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 14 external links on Comparison of sites using the LiveJournal codebase. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:47, 11 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Comparison of sites using the LiveJournal codebase. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:17, 21 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Comparison_of_sites_using_the_LiveJournal_codebase&oldid=1233650842"