Talk:Compass Group

Latest comment: 4 years ago by 2003:EE:8717:1700:15FA:3F7E:75CF:6A20 in topic ISIN incorrect

POV tag

edit

This is a sorry example of the way some editors write about what they want to write about rather than writing a balanced article about the subject at hand. All the corruption stuff is unsourced and it is wildly disproportionate to the rest of the article. Carina22 17:06, 17 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

>>> Please; check the sources mentioned at the end of the article. FOXNEWS has published many articles on this scandal. Just one of them here: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,184495,00.html

Like Fox News are known for their fair unbiased reporting!? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.13.152.47 (talk) 06:11, 7 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Information deleted

edit

Someone has been deleting interesting info from this article, regarding the United Nations corruption scandal. Was it the Public Relations staff of Compass? Beware of the three revert rule, this can be considered as vandalism.

The story is notable and deserves to be listed in the article at least somewhere. It can also be edited to include the information about the $40 million settlement that Compass Group has paid to settle the two cases brought against them. Ref: http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2006/oct/16/money.internationalnews 137.149.66.15 (talk) 15:08, 8 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Fox News and the UN Vs Compass Group.

edit

I found the removed data and better sources like the BBC and the Guardian Newspaper (UK).90.244.93.79 (talk) 21:48, 1 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

UN controversy

edit

The entire section direly needs cleaning up. It lacks flow, both in literary and factual senses, and even has areas which repeat entire phrases. --82.15.40.185 (talk) 21:49, 23 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Unsourced statements

edit

Please keep in mind WP:CITE#HOW. Unsourced statements can be deleted. Do not put references in the External links section or Sources section. Link them to the text in the article. --SueHay 03:48, 28 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Compass Group. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:16, 10 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Compass Group. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:49, 29 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Compass Group. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:58, 31 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

ISIN incorrect

edit

Hi all,

article states

  • ISIN GB0005331532

as the ISIN of the company's share.

This seems IMHO to be incorrect. My view is that

  • ISIN GB00BD6K4575

is the correct ISIN of the company's share.

Sorry, I don't know how to change the ISIN in the article. A "good fellow" may check my statement and in consequence may change the ISIN.

Thank you, and take care! --2003:EE:8717:1700:15FA:3F7E:75CF:6A20 (talk) 20:22, 3 April 2020 (UTC)Reply