Talk:Complete spatial randomness
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Expert tag
editI have added this tag for two reasons. The context/assumptions are poorly defined ...is it being assumed that the distribution is spatially uniform as nothing here precludes non-uniform distributions (the actual contexts of the equations are poorly specified)? Secondly, if non-uniform distributions are excluded then various tests against a uniform or non-clustered non-hypothesis are available which could be linked or outlined. Melcombe (talk) 13:34, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
- The tag was removed after improving the question of whether non-uniform distributions were included. I have reapplied it, as the question of useful information about testing the "complete spatial randomness" model is still open. Melcombe (talk) 09:58, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
The gamma function does not equal the factorial for integer arguments, they are offset by 1. Prof. Globi (talk) 01:27, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
It is not rigorous to refer to the locations (or points) of a point process as an "event". An event in a point process is something rather different. Prof. Globi (talk) 01:29, 4 November 2016 (UTC)