This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shopping Centers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of enclosed shopping malls, outdoor shopping centers, and dead malls on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Shopping CentersWikipedia:WikiProject Shopping CentersTemplate:WikiProject Shopping CentersShopping center articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skyscrapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that relate to skyscrapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkyscrapersWikipedia:WikiProject SkyscrapersTemplate:WikiProject SkyscrapersSkyscraper articles
Latest comment: 13 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion
Complex Desjardins is an atrium with four towers, and I do not see how it aids navigation to splinter the information on each tower into separate articles. They can be nicely contained as sections in the main article, which is little more than a stub. We can still have redirects for each tower in the Montreal skyscraper navbox under the appropriate height, which I believe was the article creator's goal. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:36, 3 February 2011 (UTC)Reply
I've rolled that back. emerson needs to be willing to at least discuss options. The World Trade Center infobox manages to include height info on each of the two former towers. There must be a way to do so here, for the three towers. If the infobox is removed again without discussions, I'm going to have to start issuing warnings, I'm afraid. best, Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:47, 4 February 2011 (UTC)Reply
It's a building, is sufficiently tall to be a skyscraper and the article is more than a stub, so I see no reason not to have it. I also couldn't see any edit summary indicating why it should be removed. --Elekhh (talk) 02:01, 4 February 2011 (UTC)Reply