Talk:Composite overwrapped pressure vessel
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Comments
editWhat exactly is referred to by "overwrapped"? Is there a metallic shell that the composite is wrapped around? I know that some composite PVs require a liner, is that what we're talking about? Khakiandmauve (talk) 22:00, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
Also, Kevlar isn't a carbon fiber, it's a polymer. Would it be more accurate to say this? "The composites most commonly used for pressure vessels are fiber reinforced polymers (FRP)[3], with carbon or kevlar fibers." Khakiandmauve (talk) 22:03, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Composite overwrapped pressure vessel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080905122843/http://www.agingaircraftconference.org/all_files/3/3c/3c-ppt.pdf to http://www.agingaircraftconference.org/all_files/3/3c/3c-ppt.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150421081326/http://ston.jsc.nasa.gov/collections/trs/_techrep/SP-2011-573.pdf to http://ston.jsc.nasa.gov/collections/trs/_techrep/SP-2011-573.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:31, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
Usage
editYeah, great, but what does it actually do? What is it used for? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dave F63 (talk • contribs) 14:53, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
Which WikiProject(s)?
editWhich WikiProject(s) should this article be assigned to? The article makes no reference to a crime, as far as I can tell. I cannot see how the article would relate to a crime, unless it is related to the failure of such vessels as a result of improper manufacture or use as well as misleading testing and falsification of any testing paperwork or the use of such vessels in making improvised explosive devices; neither of which is currently discussed in the article. Their use in Space-flight applications and the aerospace industry, more generally, would suggest the Spaceflight WikiProject is a good candidate, as well as, perhaps, the Aviation WikiProject and its Aircraft Engines task force. This article would also seem to be a good fit with the Containers WikiProject where it falls into the pressure vessels category. So I am being bold and changing the WikiProjects assignments and removing it from Crime WikiProject because it is out of scope. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 02:24, 6 June 2021 (UTC)