Talk:Compossibility

Philosophy: Metaphysics / Logic Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Metaphysics
	Logic

References?

Latest comment: 14 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Let's get a citation for what works this word is used in. NickelShoe (Talk) 19:40, 3 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

While this would certainly help--I am having a hard time thinking of philosophy texts on related subjects that don't... it may simply be "common knowledge" for the field. However--looking specifically at the Reformed scholastic period--> any text on modalism in the early Enlightenment, late Renaissance (including books on Reformed scholastics) is probably going to touch on this. If you are interested in the subject, Reformation and Scholasticism (ed., W. van Asselt) is a good start and hits the relationship in the period between philosophy and religion fairly well too.--eleuthero (talk) 00:58, 16 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

There I cited it, guys. I don't have Leibniz in front of me, but Stanford Encyclopedia is a good secondary source. That should be helpful to anyone interested in learning more. Guinness4life (talk) 03:26, 23 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Add topic