Talk:Department of Computer Science and Technology, University of Cambridge

VNC

Didn't VNC come out of here, once it was called the Olivetti Lab? Midgley (talk) 00:32, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Faculty

We only include people notable enough to have WP articles. Full professors who do not currently have articles could probably justify them by the standards in WP:PROF, but they may not be added until the articles have been accepted here. DGG ( talk ) 13:19, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Requested move 4 January 2019

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Moved as proposed. bd2412 T 02:24, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

Computer Laboratory, University of Cambridge → Department of Computer Science and Technology, University of Cambridge – The department has renamed itself, as can be seen by its website and publicity. This change has also passed in to how it is referenced, as can be seen in this recent news article. Sentimentality for the old name aside, the article should be renamed to represent the current state of the department Shadowssettle_(talk) 19:55, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

• Support Due to referencing and name change. Seems a logical move. JC7V (talk) 21:54, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
• Support per WP:NAMECHANGES. With this edit I have boldly but (I hope) sympathetically changed the text to reflect the new name. I hope this does not seem a WP:FAITACCOMPLI, as it's easily reversed. 178.164.139.37 (talk) 09:53, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

I've also updated the text of the piped link in navbox {{University of Cambridge}}. 178.164.139.37 (talk) 10:04, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

Maybe just use Department of Computer Science and Technology unless disambiguation is needed. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:51, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

Certainly not, it is not just for disambiguation's sake, but also it would put this department above others (is this suddenly THE department?), and would be out of line compared to other university department articles, both inside and outside of the University of Cambridge (against WP:CONSISTENCY, compare even the similarly long Department of Anglo-Saxon, Norse and Celtic, University of Cambridge). Also, its unclear which department this would be referring to; if the department at Tsinghua were to put information about their page on an article of that name, it wouldn't necessarily be out of line, the title not being specific (I know that last point is a little iffy, given the name is referring to the specific department, but my previous points do stand) Shadowssettle_(talk) 20:50, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

Well WP:CONSISTENCY is only relevant to how they are DABBed and not when. If is wasn't ambiguous then the "University of Cambridge" would suggest that there is another and some such as Cavendish Laboratory in Category:Departments of the University of Cambridge aren't disambiguated. However there is mention of the other at Uka Tarsadia University so maybe it will to have an article in which case "Department of Computer Science and Technology" could be the DAB. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:26, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

The Cavendish Laboratory is named, so is not really comparable. Other examples without names are specific institutes, rather than departments, where confusion is less likely. For example, the Institute for Manufacturing is quite identifiable, whereas a general "Department of xyz" is much more surprising without a institution name Shadowssettle_(talk) 20:56, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

Someone who knows the department/institute would recognize it, it isn't the purpose of titles to convoy information other than the subject's name. Crouch, Swale (talk) 21:32, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

It's just generally not how things are done on Wikipedia. Institutes and centres are generally viewed as being more autonomous, and so are not generally put with the name, but I think you'll find it almost universal that departments are named with their university. WP:CONSISTENCY is relevant, even now, as why is this one suddenly different? Should we move Department of Anglo-Saxon, Norse and Celtic, University of Cambridge, just because it's also unique and long? That's not a point to bring up here, but something much more general across Wikipedia's university coverage. Also, there's no point in moving to a page it is likely have to move from later, which just puts this argument further along the line again. I don't know why this is a point of contention even, the suggested move is a sensible name for the article. Shadowssettle_(talk) 15:39, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

As far as I'm aware per WP:PRECISE WP convention is that we do tend to use just the name even if a qualifier is often added in speech etc. It seems appropriate to have this one disambiguated (due to the Tarsadia one) but Department of Anglo-Saxon, Norse and Celtic doesn't appear to need it. Its website doesn't even include "University of Cambridge" in the title, not even as a qualifier. Many albums and films may be said to be unrecognizable without an "(Album)" or "(film)" qualifier but those that don't need it don't have it. The only exceptions I can think of are Wikipedia:Naming conventions (UK Parliament constituencies), Wikipedia:Naming conventions (U.S. state and territory highways) and WP:UKPLACE. There doesn't appear to be such a guideline for university departments. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:51, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation is needed, because this is not likely to be the primary use of the search term even on Wikipedia, despite being a redlink. Department of Computer Science redirects to Computer science, and Department of Computer Science and Technology should do the same. Dekimasuよ! 20:30, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

• Support as proposed. Dekimasuよ! 20:30, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

  Good point, Support as proposed to. Crouch, Swale (talk) 21:28, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Coordinate error[{google-chrome-link-xl-facbook}]

{{geodata-check}}

The following coordinate fixes are needed for

—140.213.138.132 (talk) 16:09, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

You haven't said what you think is wrong with the coordinates in the article, and they appear to be correct. If you still think that there is an error, you'll need to supply a clear explanation of what it is. Deor (talk) 17:43, 18 December 2021 (UTC)