Administrators' newsletter – July 2024

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2024).

 

  Administrator changes

 
 

  Technical news

  Miscellaneous


Precious anniversary

edit
Precious
 
Five years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:24, 8 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Amazing geocoding work

edit
  The Barnstar of Diligence
For your amazing work in geocoding — The Anome (talk) 14:07, 18 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Administrators' newsletter – August 2024

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2024).

  Administrator changes

  Isabelle Belato
 

  Interface administrator changes

  Izno
 

  CheckUser changes

  Barkeep49

  Technical news

  • Global blocks may now target accounts as well as IP's. Administrators may locally unblock when appropriate.
  • Users wishing to permanently leave may now request "vanishing" via Special:GlobalVanishRequest. Processed requests will result in the user being renamed, their recovery email being removed, and their account being globally locked.

  Arbitration


Turning myself in.

edit

I accidentally screwed up the article about smoke grenades. I don’t know what the heck I did, but that page is broken. So I am turning myself in as an unintentional vandal. Professor Penguino (talk) 13:26, 12 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

I undid your page move. (I think you could have done this yourself, since the redirect you left at Smoke grenade had no history other than your move.) Anyway, no problem. Deor (talk) 13:33, 12 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thank you very much!
I did try to undo my own edit, but it kept saying the operation failed. All’s well that ends well! Professor Penguino (talk) 13:44, 12 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
By the way, what I originally wanted to do was capitalize the first letter of the article. On my end at least, it looked like “smoke grenade” and not “Smoke grenade”. It didn’t work, so I thought it was a glitch. Instead I decided to move the article to another name first, and then move it to “Smoke grenade.” When I tried moving it, I got an error message. When I tried undoing my move, I got an error message. And that’s when I realized I screwed up. Professor Penguino (talk) 13:47, 12 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Professor Penguino: Yes, for some reason there was a {{Lowercase}} template at the bottom of the article, and that's what was causing the title to appear as "smoke grenade" rather than "Smoke grenade". I've removed it. Deor (talk) 13:51, 12 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thank you again! Professor Penguino (talk) 13:53, 12 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Voluntary block

edit

Is it possible to have my access to Wikipedia pages, except my personal page and its talk page, blocked for one year. I need to take that time to reflect on my situation in Wikipedia. Dominic Mayers (talk) 01:18, 18 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Dominic Mayers: I haven't any objection to blocking a user who requests a block; but I don't believe I've ever done so, and I'm not sure what you mean by "access". As far as I know, if I fully block you, you'll be able to edit your user talk page but not your user page and its subpages (and you'll still, of course, be able to view any Wikipedia pages, just not to edit them). If you want to end your block before the year is up, you'll have to request an unblock on your talk page.
Alternatively, I could do a partial block preventing you from editing mainspace pages and their talk pages, and you'd still be able to edit your own user page and talk page (as well as other non-mainsapce pages).
As you might perceive, I'm waffling a bit here because I'm not really sure what you want. I can see that you may be frustrated by some interactions at Talk:Epistemology, but perhaps just staying away from that article for a while may be all that's needed. Can you clarify exactly what you want to be prevented from doing here? Or you may be more comfortable asking one of the admins in Category:Wikipedia administrators willing to consider placing self-requested blocks, who doubtless have more experience than I with this sort of thing. Deor (talk) 02:07, 18 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
That's OK. I did not explain myself well. Can you block me in writing for the main space, the associated talk pages, and the wikipedia space and would this still allow me to modify my personal page and its talk page ? Dominic Mayers (talk) 02:19, 18 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
All right, I've blocked you from article, article talk, Wikipedia, and Wikipedia talk pages for one year. If you want the block removed before it expires, you can just ask me here, since you should still be able to edit User talk pages. Deor (talk) 02:31, 18 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

periods, commas, and quotation marks

edit

In the following quotation in Voltaire, I placed the period outside the quotation mark and you switched it back: "have surpassed all nations in impertinent fables, in bad conduct and in barbarism. You deserve to be punished, for this is your destiny." You are correct, of course, because, in the U.S., periods and commas go inside quotation marks. But Wikipedia, to my knowledge, does the reverse. I don't know the Wikipedia page that has punctuation rules. Can you let me know, and we'll check this point? Thanks. Maurice Magnus (talk) 11:27, 18 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Maurice Magnus: The relevant Manual of Style guideline can be found at WP:LQ. The sentence covering the situation you've cited above, as I see it, is "When quoting a full sentence, the end of which coincides with the end of the sentence containing it, place terminal punctuation inside the closing quotation mark." Of course, this case is somewhat odd, since the quoted matter consists of both a partial sentence and a full sentence, so that if the quotation ended at "... in barbarism", the period would indeed go outside the closing quotation mark; but the guideline seems clear to me. Deor (talk) 14:35, 18 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Deor: I agree, and I congratulate you on being one of the few, if not the only, Wikipedia editor who is aware of the different rules for complete sentences and partial sentences. I think it's crazy to make this so complex, as it results in its not being adhered to anyway. We ought to have periods and commas inside quotation marks in all cases, just as every other publication in the U.S. does. Maurice Magnus (talk) 15:01, 18 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Administrators' newsletter – September 2024

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2024).

  Administrator changes

  Pppery

  Interface administrator changes

  Pppery
 

  Oversighter changes

  Wugapodes

  CheckUser changes

 

  Guideline and policy news

  • Following an RfC, there is a new criterion for speedy deletion: C4, which applies to unused maintenance categories, such as empty dated maintenance categories for dates in the past.
  • A request for comment is open to discuss whether Notability (species) should be adopted as a subject-specific notability guideline.

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous


re: james rosebush omission from boston univ page

edit

May I ask why this was reverted? Gregorcollins (talk) 23:44, 10 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Gregorcollins: As I explained in my edit summary, the edit provided incorrect information about him: he was not the White House Chief of Staff. His position as a Reagan advisor doesn't seem important enough to mention, as compared with the positions held by the other people mentioned in that paragraph. Moreover, the inclusion was not supported by the reference it preceded. Deor (talk) 23:58, 10 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Vagina dentata

edit

Thanks for your reversion of my addition of the "Prometheus" Trilobite to the "vagina dentata" article. After a bit of research, I found an academic paper that discusses the feminist viewpoints portrayed in "Prometheus." It contains the following sentence: "In Prometheus, the Trilobite uses its many arms to draw the engineer into its vagina dentata where he is suffocated." None of that lame fandom "mouth" nonsense! So, I undid your reversion and added the Trilobite back in with this new reference. Please let me know if this entry is acceptable now. Beadbop (talk) 15:04, 11 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

I made a few tweaks, but it looks OK to me. Deor (talk) 15:23, 11 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Since your reply, I also made a couple more tweaks to the reference section. All should be well now.
p.s. The academic paper I cited even has a photo of the Trilobite in Fig. 2, with the caption "The alien, Trilobite, and its representation of female anatomy and the vagina dentata, drawing inspiration from the octopus (Scott 2012)(©Twentieth Century Fox).
I love learning new things every day!  :) Beadbop (talk) 15:40, 11 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Claude Houghton photo portrait

edit

Hello, I've seen this document [File:Claude Houghton, c. 1948.jpg] and I am pretty sure this is not a 1948 photograph. Hope to find an earlier source in order to share it on commons. Yours, Marc-AntoineV (talk) 11:32, 22 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Edit explained as rm stray character

edit

And you removed 1609 of them not so stray at Kakanui Range ChaseKiwi (talk) 01:48, 24 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

@ChaseKiwi: Sorry about that; I must have misclicked. I've redone the edit properly. Deor (talk) 11:51, 24 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Better detective work than my eyeball there. ChaseKiwi (talk) 17:45, 24 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Administrators' newsletter – October 2024

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2024).

 

  Administrator changes

 
 

  CheckUser changes

 
 

  Guideline and policy news

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous


moore again

edit

hiya, left a note for you continuing our discussion on the marianne moore talk page, am hoping for a response Potholehotline (talk) 21:46, 9 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Invitation to participate in a research

edit

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC) Reply

Administrators' newsletter – November 2024

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2024).

 

  Administrator changes

 
 

  CheckUser changes

  Maxim

  Oversighter changes

  Maxim

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  • Mass deletions done with the Nuke tool now have the 'Nuke' tag. This change will make reviewing and analyzing deletions performed with the tool easier. T366068

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous


Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research

edit

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:18, 13 November 2024 (UTC) Reply

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Anomebot

edit

Hi Deor, I'm having a go at bringing the Anomebot online again. After such a long time, there's going to be a massive backlog, and I may need to write some category-based custom code to update the bot's internal logs to catch up with the backlog so it doesn't spend all its time checking articles that don't need upating at runtime.

Unfortunately, a bunch of Python 3 conversion of older code got lost in the crash/multiple backup failures, and I will have to re-do this. And there's lots of it to do. The Anomebot system is quite big, and has evolved over years.

Hopefully I will have all this done in a couple of weeks; this is a fairly low-priority project for me at the moment. — The Anome (talk) 12:39, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

It was easier than I expected: a shift to using the Python requests package has eliminated a lot of tricky code in the process, and 'just works', so the output part of the system is now working. The analysis side needs a bit more tweaking, though. — The Anome (talk) 23:22, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
@The Anome: OK, as you have probably deduced, I've been using your bot's contributions to identify articles that need coordinates. I won't be able to handle the backlog, no doubt, but so it goes. Deor (talk) 23:29, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for your patience in this. The article editing end of the bot is grinding its way through the backlog now, and will be doing so for several days. Unfortunately, about a year's worth of bug fixes went missing with the data loss, so it will also be re-making a lot of mistakes, and the re-try log data is also old, so it will unfortunately be revisiting some articles it shouldn't. However, I think this is a realistic price to pay for getting the bot back online now, instead of some indefinite future.
I've also just gone back and removed some questionable edits.
I'll see if there some way of mitigating some of these problems at some point soon, starting with getting the edit history out of Wikipedia's own logs and using that to bring the bot's internal edit log up to date. I've paused the bot run for now until that's finished. — The Anome (talk) 12:53, 20 November 2024 (UTC)Reply