Deor
|
Administrators' newsletter – July 2024
editNews and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2024).
- Local administrators can now add new links to the bottom of the site Tools menu without using JavaScript. Documentation is available on MediaWiki. (T6086)
- The Community Wishlist is re-opening on 15 July 2024. Read more
Precious anniversary
editFive years! |
---|
Amazing geocoding work
editThe Barnstar of Diligence | ||
For your amazing work in geocoding — The Anome (talk) 14:07, 18 July 2024 (UTC) |
Administrators' newsletter – August 2024
editNews and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2024).
- Global blocks may now target accounts as well as IP's. Administrators may locally unblock when appropriate.
- Users wishing to permanently leave may now request "vanishing" via Special:GlobalVanishRequest. Processed requests will result in the user being renamed, their recovery email being removed, and their account being globally locked.
- The Arbitration Committee appointed the following administrators to the conflict of interest volunteer response team: Bilby, Extraordinary Writ
Turning myself in.
editI accidentally screwed up the article about smoke grenades. I don’t know what the heck I did, but that page is broken. So I am turning myself in as an unintentional vandal. Professor Penguino (talk) 13:26, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
- I undid your page move. (I think you could have done this yourself, since the redirect you left at Smoke grenade had no history other than your move.) Anyway, no problem. Deor (talk) 13:33, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you very much!
- I did try to undo my own edit, but it kept saying the operation failed. All’s well that ends well! Professor Penguino (talk) 13:44, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
- By the way, what I originally wanted to do was capitalize the first letter of the article. On my end at least, it looked like “smoke grenade” and not “Smoke grenade”. It didn’t work, so I thought it was a glitch. Instead I decided to move the article to another name first, and then move it to “Smoke grenade.” When I tried moving it, I got an error message. When I tried undoing my move, I got an error message. And that’s when I realized I screwed up. Professor Penguino (talk) 13:47, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Professor Penguino: Yes, for some reason there was a {{Lowercase}} template at the bottom of the article, and that's what was causing the title to appear as "smoke grenade" rather than "Smoke grenade". I've removed it. Deor (talk) 13:51, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you again! Professor Penguino (talk) 13:53, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Professor Penguino: Yes, for some reason there was a {{Lowercase}} template at the bottom of the article, and that's what was causing the title to appear as "smoke grenade" rather than "Smoke grenade". I've removed it. Deor (talk) 13:51, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
Voluntary block
editIs it possible to have my access to Wikipedia pages, except my personal page and its talk page, blocked for one year. I need to take that time to reflect on my situation in Wikipedia. Dominic Mayers (talk) 01:18, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Dominic Mayers: I haven't any objection to blocking a user who requests a block; but I don't believe I've ever done so, and I'm not sure what you mean by "access". As far as I know, if I fully block you, you'll be able to edit your user talk page but not your user page and its subpages (and you'll still, of course, be able to view any Wikipedia pages, just not to edit them). If you want to end your block before the year is up, you'll have to request an unblock on your talk page.
- Alternatively, I could do a partial block preventing you from editing mainspace pages and their talk pages, and you'd still be able to edit your own user page and talk page (as well as other non-mainsapce pages).
- As you might perceive, I'm waffling a bit here because I'm not really sure what you want. I can see that you may be frustrated by some interactions at Talk:Epistemology, but perhaps just staying away from that article for a while may be all that's needed. Can you clarify exactly what you want to be prevented from doing here? Or you may be more comfortable asking one of the admins in Category:Wikipedia administrators willing to consider placing self-requested blocks, who doubtless have more experience than I with this sort of thing. Deor (talk) 02:07, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- That's OK. I did not explain myself well. Can you block me in writing for the main space, the associated talk pages, and the wikipedia space and would this still allow me to modify my personal page and its talk page ? Dominic Mayers (talk) 02:19, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- All right, I've blocked you from article, article talk, Wikipedia, and Wikipedia talk pages for one year. If you want the block removed before it expires, you can just ask me here, since you should still be able to edit User talk pages. Deor (talk) 02:31, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- That's OK. I did not explain myself well. Can you block me in writing for the main space, the associated talk pages, and the wikipedia space and would this still allow me to modify my personal page and its talk page ? Dominic Mayers (talk) 02:19, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
periods, commas, and quotation marks
editIn the following quotation in Voltaire, I placed the period outside the quotation mark and you switched it back: "have surpassed all nations in impertinent fables, in bad conduct and in barbarism. You deserve to be punished, for this is your destiny." You are correct, of course, because, in the U.S., periods and commas go inside quotation marks. But Wikipedia, to my knowledge, does the reverse. I don't know the Wikipedia page that has punctuation rules. Can you let me know, and we'll check this point? Thanks. Maurice Magnus (talk) 11:27, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Maurice Magnus: The relevant Manual of Style guideline can be found at WP:LQ. The sentence covering the situation you've cited above, as I see it, is "When quoting a full sentence, the end of which coincides with the end of the sentence containing it, place terminal punctuation inside the closing quotation mark." Of course, this case is somewhat odd, since the quoted matter consists of both a partial sentence and a full sentence, so that if the quotation ended at "... in barbarism", the period would indeed go outside the closing quotation mark; but the guideline seems clear to me. Deor (talk) 14:35, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Deor: I agree, and I congratulate you on being one of the few, if not the only, Wikipedia editor who is aware of the different rules for complete sentences and partial sentences. I think it's crazy to make this so complex, as it results in its not being adhered to anyway. We ought to have periods and commas inside quotation marks in all cases, just as every other publication in the U.S. does. Maurice Magnus (talk) 15:01, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – September 2024
editNews and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2024).
- Following an RfC, there is a new criterion for speedy deletion: C4, which
applies to unused maintenance categories, such as empty dated maintenance categories for dates in the past
. - A request for comment is open to discuss whether Notability (species) should be adopted as a subject-specific notability guideline.
- Following a motion, remedies 5.1 and 5.2 of World War II and the history of Jews in Poland (the topic and interaction bans on My very best wishes, respectively) were repealed.
- Remedy 3C of the German war effort case ("Cinderella157 German history topic ban") was suspended for a period of six months.
- The arbitration case Historical Elections is currently open. Proposed decision is expected by 3 September 2024 for this case.
- Editors can now enter into good article review circles, an alternative for informal quid pro quo arrangements, to have a GAN reviewed in return for reviewing a different editor's nomination.
- A New Pages Patrol backlog drive is happening in September 2024 to reduce the number of unreviewed articles and redirects in the new pages feed. Currently, there is a backlog of over 13,900 articles and 26,200 redirects awaiting review. Sign up here to participate!
re: james rosebush omission from boston univ page
editMay I ask why this was reverted? Gregorcollins (talk) 23:44, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Gregorcollins: As I explained in my edit summary, the edit provided incorrect information about him: he was not the White House Chief of Staff. His position as a Reagan advisor doesn't seem important enough to mention, as compared with the positions held by the other people mentioned in that paragraph. Moreover, the inclusion was not supported by the reference it preceded. Deor (talk) 23:58, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
Vagina dentata
editThanks for your reversion of my addition of the "Prometheus" Trilobite to the "vagina dentata" article. After a bit of research, I found an academic paper that discusses the feminist viewpoints portrayed in "Prometheus." It contains the following sentence: "In Prometheus, the Trilobite uses its many arms to draw the engineer into its vagina dentata where he is suffocated." None of that lame fandom "mouth" nonsense! So, I undid your reversion and added the Trilobite back in with this new reference. Please let me know if this entry is acceptable now. Beadbop (talk) 15:04, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- I made a few tweaks, but it looks OK to me. Deor (talk) 15:23, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Since your reply, I also made a couple more tweaks to the reference section. All should be well now.
- p.s. The academic paper I cited even has a photo of the Trilobite in Fig. 2, with the caption "The alien, Trilobite, and its representation of female anatomy and the vagina dentata, drawing inspiration from the octopus (Scott 2012)(©Twentieth Century Fox).
- I love learning new things every day! :) Beadbop (talk) 15:40, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
Claude Houghton photo portrait
editHello, I've seen this document [File:Claude Houghton, c. 1948.jpg] and I am pretty sure this is not a 1948 photograph. Hope to find an earlier source in order to share it on commons. Yours, Marc-AntoineV (talk) 11:32, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Edit explained as rm stray character
editAnd you removed 1609 of them not so stray at Kakanui Range ChaseKiwi (talk) 01:48, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- @ChaseKiwi: Sorry about that; I must have misclicked. I've redone the edit properly. Deor (talk) 11:51, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Better detective work than my eyeball there. ChaseKiwi (talk) 17:45, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – October 2024
editNews and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2024).
- Administrator elections are a proposed new process for selecting administrators, offering an alternative to requests for adminship (RfA). The first trial election will take place in October 2024, with candidate sign-up from October 8 to 14, a discussion phase from October 22 to 24, and SecurePoll voting from October 25 to 31. For questions or to help out, please visit the talk page at Wikipedia talk:Administrator elections.
- Following a discussion, the speedy deletion reason "File pages without a corresponding file" has been moved from criterion G8 to F2. This does not change what can be speedily deleted.
- A request for comment is open to discuss whether there is a consensus to have an administrator recall process.
- The arbitration case Historical elections has been closed.
- An arbitration case regarding Backlash to diversity and inclusion has been opened.
- Editors are invited to nominate themselves to serve on the 2024 Arbitration Committee Electoral Commission until 23:59 October 8, 2024 (UTC).
- If you are interested in stopping spammers, please put MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist and MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist on your watchlist, and help out when you can.
moore again
edithiya, left a note for you continuing our discussion on the marianne moore talk page, am hoping for a response Potholehotline (talk) 21:46, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Invitation to participate in a research
editHello,
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .
Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
Kind Regards,
Administrators' newsletter – November 2024
editNews and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2024).
- Following a discussion, the discussion-only period proposal that went for a trial to refine the requests for adminship (RfA) process has been discontinued.
- Following a request for comment, Administrator recall is adopted as a policy.
- Mass deletions done with the Nuke tool now have the 'Nuke' tag. This change will make reviewing and analyzing deletions performed with the tool easier. T366068
- RoySmith, Barkeep49 and Cyberpower678 have been appointed to the Electoral Commission for the 2024 Arbitration Committee Elections. ThadeusOfNazereth and Dr vulpes are reserve commissioners.
- Eligible editors are invited to self-nominate from 3 November 2024 until 12 November 2024 to stand in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections.
- The Arbitration Committee is seeking volunteers for roles such as clerks, access to the COI queue, checkuser, and oversight.
- An unreferenced articles backlog drive is happening in November 2024 to reduce the backlog of articles tagged with {{Unreferenced}}. You can help reduce the backlog by adding citations to these articles. Sign up to participate!
Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research
editHello,
I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.
Take the survey here.
Kind Regards,
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
editHello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Anomebot
editHi Deor, I'm having a go at bringing the Anomebot online again. After such a long time, there's going to be a massive backlog, and I may need to write some category-based custom code to update the bot's internal logs to catch up with the backlog so it doesn't spend all its time checking articles that don't need upating at runtime.
Unfortunately, a bunch of Python 3 conversion of older code got lost in the crash/multiple backup failures, and I will have to re-do this. And there's lots of it to do. The Anomebot system is quite big, and has evolved over years.
Hopefully I will have all this done in a couple of weeks; this is a fairly low-priority project for me at the moment. — The Anome (talk) 12:39, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- It was easier than I expected: a shift to using the Python requests package has eliminated a lot of tricky code in the process, and 'just works', so the output part of the system is now working. The analysis side needs a bit more tweaking, though. — The Anome (talk) 23:22, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- @The Anome: OK, as you have probably deduced, I've been using your bot's contributions to identify articles that need coordinates. I won't be able to handle the backlog, no doubt, but so it goes. Deor (talk) 23:29, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your patience in this. The article editing end of the bot is grinding its way through the backlog now, and will be doing so for several days. Unfortunately, about a year's worth of bug fixes went missing with the data loss, so it will also be re-making a lot of mistakes, and the re-try log data is also old, so it will unfortunately be revisiting some articles it shouldn't. However, I think this is a realistic price to pay for getting the bot back online now, instead of some indefinite future.
- I've also just gone back and removed some questionable edits.
- I'll see if there some way of mitigating some of these problems at some point soon, starting with getting the edit history out of Wikipedia's own logs and using that to bring the bot's internal edit log up to date. I've paused the bot run for now until that's finished. — The Anome (talk) 12:53, 20 November 2024 (UTC)