Talk:Computer engineering
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Computer engineering article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 12 months |
This level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
editThis article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 1 September 2020 and 18 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Splash6815.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:24, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
About Engineering Associations
editAre there any open enough engineering associations? Puppet reel (talk) 04:32, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
Subfield?
editIs this a subfield of a general electronic control systems? Is the same or part of an electronic system design? Any ideas or sources? >AXONOV (talk) ⚑ 09:27, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
- Not that I've seen it used. A more stereotypical Computer Engineering role would be a processor designer. Either Computer or Electrical engineers might find themselves working control systems. Bakkster Man (talk) 16:05, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
Wiki Education assignment: First Year English Composition 1001
editThis article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 August 2023 and 30 November 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): GunnarLacher (article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by GunnarLacher (talk) 14:06, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
Re: "Skills needed" section
editNewbie editor here writing in regard to the "skills needed" section — I've cross-referenced other Wikipedia articles and haven't seen anything similar to it (not inherently a good reason), but after rewriting it it seems somewhat[?] redundant in my opinion.
Looking to learn, thanks. Smeegent (talk) 15:24, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Smeegent I agree this doesn't make much sense. The source cited also seems questionable. Jantokiilo (talk) 01:19, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
@ 2400:AC40:620:25B9:E1A1:34FC:7137:EBB1 (talk) 20:40, 4 July 2024 (UTC)