This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles
The Concarril page should not have been moved, given that there was no discussion, only a proposal by one user – which generated no comments. As I wrote in this edit summary, the article is primarily about a private company that no longer exists, not about a facility. This move should be reverted. A separate article should be written about Bombardier Transportation Mexico, and then most (not all) of the text about Concarril's successor(s) moved/copied to it. Both companies are notable; indeed, Concarril is actually more notable because it was a standalone company, not a subsidiary or division of a much larger international company with the same name, as BTM is. SJ Morg (talk) 10:52, 14 January 2022 (UTC)Reply