Talk:Concordat of 1933
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Concordat of 1933
editNo idea why this is redirecting to the Reichskonkordat - it's certainly not the same thing. I'm updating the article with some decent info. --PeterBrietbart (talk) 13:07, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
There's an article here now. It's no longer redirecting to the utterly unrelated Reichskonkordat, and instead there's some info about the thing. --PeterBrietbart (talk) 13:38, 22 June 2010 (UTC) Would it be Possible to get a little more info in here pls, this is fairly bare bones and some background/ linkage would defo help. thx! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.195.74.194 (talk) 08:51, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Concordat of 1933. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100803041200/http://moses.creighton.edu/JRS/2008/2008-5.html to http://moses.creighton.edu/JRS/2008/2008-5.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:57, 11 August 2017 (UTC)