Talk:Concordia University Netanyahu riot

Latest comment: 1 month ago by Drspaniel in topic bias

Clearly NOT "NPOV"

edit

This article is written from an obvious and apparent Likud bias- it treats as unassailable fact the claim that the entire incident was the fault of pro-Palestinian students and treats pro-Israeli people there that evening as if they are innocent victims. Please examine and re-edit for NPOV.(USER:Ken Burch — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:603:4E00:7876:B536:11D5:7BAF:2CA2 (talk) 02:30, 22 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

yeah. sort of ridiculous. needs to be unbiased as this is wikipedia after all Drspaniel (talk) 15:34, 5 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Concordia University Netanyahu riot. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:50, 29 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Unbelievable bias

edit

Using Pro-Israel Pro-Zionist think tanks as descriptives of the situation really makes this a joke of an article. 2001:1970:5163:1200:0:0:0:5CDE (talk) 21:27, 3 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

bias

edit

the article goes in depth about Individual accounts, but does not explain background context. Drspaniel (talk) 15:36, 5 October 2024 (UTC)Reply