Talk:Concurrent resolution

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has not yet been assigned a subject. The options are: "Person", "People", "Place", "Thing", or "Events".

censure

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Isn't censure a concurrent resolution? 65.24.127.241 14:15, 6 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Usually not. When the House or the Senate censures one of its members, it does so by a simple resolution. If, perhaps, the Congress as a whole was going to censure another individual (presumably the President or an executive branch official) then it would probably be done by a concurrent resolution. JasonCNJ 22:45, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Do any other legislatures have this concept?

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The lede suggests this concept is applicable in any bicameral legislature, but the rest of the article talks about the US Congress only. Is this term "concurrent resolution" used in other legislatures, especially those of other countries? If not, I think the lede should be changed to make clear that this term is specific to US Congress. If yes, then article should give some examples from other countries too. SJK (talk) 08:26, 1 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Concurrent resolution. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140316034853/http://assets.opencrs.com/rpts/98-706_20101202.pdf to http://assets.opencrs.com/rpts/98-706_20101202.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:41, 26 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic