Talk:Conduction aphasia

Conduction aphasia was nominated as a Natural sciences good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (May 1, 2020). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

Medicine Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Neuroscience Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disability

Conduction aphasia is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability articles

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Conduction aphasia.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

The

Latest comment: 11 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

The last part is incorrect. Conduction aphasia does NOT result from a disconnection between Broca's area and Wernike's Area. In fact, it is caused from a Cortical Disorder such as lesion to cortical areas such as: SPT, posterior STG (wernike's area) and/or SMG. The notion that a disconnection between Broca's and Wernike's area causes Conduction aphasia is 15-20 years old and still needs to be revised in many textbooks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.200.69.173 (talk) 11:06, 28 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your suggestion. When you feel an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes. Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the edit this page link at the top. The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes — they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons why you might want to). WhatamIdoing (talk) 00:49, 4 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Study state conduction throught a flot slab or wall — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.38.18.141 (talk) 06:50, 7 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Add topic