Talk:Confederate Monument in Cynthiana

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Footnote 9

edit

The citation in footnote 9 is to "Brent." That is patently insufficient to support anything - who or what is "Brent" and where does one go to check that the source supports what it purportedly does? I wanted to check because the citation is offered as support for the statement that at the dedication ceremony, the monument was for the "virtue" of the "Confederate cause." As it's written now, the sentence pre-supposes the "virtue" of the "Confederate cause," which many would dispute. I thought it would likely be more accurate to say that someone in history stated that the monument was for the "virtue" of the "Confederate cause," but wanted to check the source to find out who said it and when. If the citation can't be verified, the statement should be removed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.124.60.120 (talk) 18:41, 28 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

There was already a citation for a work done by a Joseph Brent, so it was cited. I cleaned up the reference, but it was there.
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Confederate Monument in Cynthiana. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:41, 12 August 2017 (UTC)Reply