Talk:Confessions Tour/GA2

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Casliber in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Casliber (talk · contribs) 01:01, 22 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Righty-ho, I am reading through now and am making straightforward changes as I go. Please revert any where I inadvertently change the meaning. Queries below. Also, don't automatically do what I suggest - if you think otherwise please say so and we can discuss. cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 01:01, 22 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

1. Well written?:

Prose quality:  
Manual of Style compliance:  

2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:

References to sources:  
Citations to reliable sources, where required:  
No original research:  

3. Broad in coverage?:

Major aspects:  
Focused:  

4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:

Fair representation without bias:  

5. Reasonably stable?

No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):  

6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:

Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  

Overall:

Pass or Fail:   - pending outcome of review of key image really. I think it qualifies but best to get it sorted out now. Article required little tweaking - well done. Casliber (talk · contribs) 22:49, 23 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
Thank you, even Im waiting for that only. --Legolas (talk2me) 12:03, 24 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
Grrrr. The image was ultimately deleted, hence no non-free images exist now in the article. --Legolas (talk2me) 03:50, 30 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
Ok, done and dusted. Casliber (talk · contribs) 10:43, 30 December 2009 (UTC)Reply