Talk:Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Unconstitutional?
editHas anyone objected that this Act is unconstitutional because it violates the Constitutional clause that says that "each House may determine the rules of its proceedings"? Grover cleveland (talk) 20:26, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
- The Act states that it is an exercise of that Constitutional power. -- Dauster (talk) 10:35, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
- So would it be constitutional, say, to enshrine the 60-vote cloture procedure for a Senate filibuster in legislation? Grover cleveland (talk) 19:57, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
- I hear you. That's a subject for healthy debate. Personally, I think it's within the Senate's Constitutional power to tie its own hands, even if it's foolish to do so. -- Dauster (talk) 00:26, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
- I guess the interesting question would be: what would happen if the senate, but only the senate, voted to withdraw from the procedural constraints enshrined in the Act? Constitutionally it would seem that the senate must have the right to "determine the rules of its [own] proceedings" -- i.e. that the lack of approval from the House or President cannot prevent the senate from changing its rules unilaterally. Grover cleveland (talk) 18:40, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
- Quite so. The Senate could, by a simple resolution passed by the Senate alone, modify its rules under the Act. The House does so in effect by passing rules that govern bills notwithstanding Budget Act prohibitions. Dauster (talk) 10:46, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
- I guess the interesting question would be: what would happen if the senate, but only the senate, voted to withdraw from the procedural constraints enshrined in the Act? Constitutionally it would seem that the senate must have the right to "determine the rules of its [own] proceedings" -- i.e. that the lack of approval from the House or President cannot prevent the senate from changing its rules unilaterally. Grover cleveland (talk) 18:40, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
- I hear you. That's a subject for healthy debate. Personally, I think it's within the Senate's Constitutional power to tie its own hands, even if it's foolish to do so. -- Dauster (talk) 00:26, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
- So would it be constitutional, say, to enshrine the 60-vote cloture procedure for a Senate filibuster in legislation? Grover cleveland (talk) 19:57, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110306013143/http://uscode.house.gov/download/pls/02C17B.txt to http://uscode.house.gov/download/pls/02C17B.txt
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:52, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080528194701/http://budget.senate.gov/democratic/ to http://budget.senate.gov/democratic/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080524062501/http://budget.senate.gov/republican/ to http://budget.senate.gov/republican/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:32, 12 August 2017 (UTC)