Talk:Congressional pension

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is about one (or many) thing(s).

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Congressional pension. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20120716164307/http://legacy.c-span.org/questions/weekly68.asp to http://legacy.c-span.org/questions/weekly68.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:42, 12 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

This article

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

This edit caught my eye. The edit appeared on my watchlist because I had earlier made minor edits to the article ([1]) where I had not paid much attention to article content. I'm presently a bit interested in the topic, so I looked at the article content beyond my specific editorial concern of the moment.

I have misgivings about the article format; it seems to be organized more as a chronological history of changes to Congressional pension than as a presentation of information about that topic. Currently, its two main sections are History of congressional pensions and Update from 2017 CRS Report. That second-mentioned section began in this January 2019 edit as an addition of information into the History of ... section, and has since been elevated to a major section. I think the article would be better if it were more focused on its topic rather than on the history of changes. The article is small enough at this point that refocusing it should not be a major task.

Right now, considering WP:DATED, I'm adding an {{as of}} template to the lead section. I think that the article would be better if it focused on information about its topic as of a stated currency date -- probably with information about how it came to be that way presented as explanatory footnotes. I will likely, as I have time, revisit this article and make edits towards that end. If you have comments or disagreements, please comment below before I get started on that or (better) come to an editorial consensus on this and make the changes with little or no involvement by me. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 10:43, 21 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

I've made some tweaks which I think improve the article. These are pretty minor. Please edit as needed to improve further. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 12:48, 22 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Add topic