This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
AfC material
editThe following two items were included in the original AfC submission, and have been move here for historical reasons. AKRadeckiSpeaketh 21:28, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
Comment
editIn the interest of full disclosure, this submission is being written by a Quadro Engineering employee. I am aware of the rules and guidelines of Wikipedia, especially governing conflict of interest and company notability, and will be more than happy to abide by them. I'll be keeping my edits to talk pages only (beyond this initial submission) in order to avoid any conflicts. I can provide information regarding Quadro and/or conical mills as needed; I'd particularly like to have a picture of a conical mill in the article. If you wish to contact me, please do so at removing personal contact information. Thanks! 65.216.74.168 (talk) 18:13, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
Reply
editThanks for reviewing the article: I've added more sources to the document (new ones in italics). I can supply some patents and studies where Quadro conical mills are used, but I think that might make it sound too much like a COI. And I hate to bring up the "if-that's-in-why-not-this" argument, but the hammermill article isn't much better. Thanks again! 65.216.74.168 (talk) 20:41, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
Redirect?
editCould we please add a redirect from "Conical screen mill" to this page? The machine can be called one or the other, and "conical screen mill" does not bring this article up on its search. Thanks! 65.216.74.168 (talk) 13:33, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
- Done. Martinmsgj 14:45, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks, Martin! 65.216.74.168 (talk) 14:40, 3 March 2009 (UTC)