Talk:Conner Prairie

Latest comment: 5 months ago by Mvcg66b3r in topic Advertisement Issue

Assessment comment

edit

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Conner Prairie/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)Press [show] to view →
==June 25, 2009 assessment==

I just re-assessed this article for Wikiproject Reenactment as C-class (up from Start-class). In checking against B-class criteria I find the following:

  1. Referencing and citations: not met.   The article needs better referencing, including more inline citations.
  2. Coverage and accuracy: met.   This is right on the edge; I think several sections could still use expansion, but the frame of it is certainly there.
  3. Structure: met.  
  4. Grammar: met.  
  5. Supporting materials: not met.   I think this would benefit substantially from a map showing the general layout of the museum grounds (or an aerial photo -- perhaps someone could take one looking down from the balloon). It would also benefit from better photographs, possibly including building exteriors, the balloon, costumed staff, and special events.
  6. Accessibility: met.  
Overall, I think this article is coming along well. Cheers! cmadler (talk) 14:34, 25 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Last edited at 14:34, 25 June 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 12:10, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Conner Prairie. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:19, 12 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Conner Prairie. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:30, 17 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

I agree that much of the latter portion of the article reads like an advertisement for Conner Prairie. A solution appears to be deleting those lines and simply have a single link to the company website for visitor engagement.

However, if I am wrong and the article is judged not to have advertisement content, I do not want to delete what appears to be the offending content erroneously.

I will appreciate any advice on moving forward. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Robertnola (talkcontribs) 14:14, 18 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

@Sammi Brie: Can you look at this article and see what needs to be cut (promotional content, etc.)? I'm sure there's some WP:SIGCOV in the Indy papers. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 01:44, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
I have not had my regular computer this week (and still don't), so I have held off from major editing work this week @Mvcg66b3r. This is not a topic I am familiar with, but you have the right idea. You have TWL access yourself and could probably do a good job. Sammi Brie (she/her • tc) 04:06, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Why don't you have your regular computer? Mvcg66b3r (talk) 04:10, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply