Talk:Connie Talbot's Holiday Magic/GA1
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Moisejp in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Moisejp (talk · contribs) 06:34, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
Hi. I'll be reviewing this article for GA in the next few days. Moisejp (talk) 06:34, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- The references are all reliable sources. I looked at all of the online ones and the info stated in the article checked out.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It is satisfactorily broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Both good and bad reviews included.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars. Stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- The one image used has a proper fair use rationale.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Rather than bringing up any minor issues here, I made a number of small copy edits to clean them up. There were three dead links, but I replaced one, and the other two didn't seem necessary (see my edit summaries). I am very happy to pass this article. Good job. Moisejp (talk) 16:28, 10 November 2011 (UTC)