Talk:Conostichoceras

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cephalopods, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.CephalopodsWikipedia:WikiProject CephalopodsTemplate:WikiProject CephalopodsCephalopods articles

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

It is requested that an image or photograph of Conostichoceras be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Fast moving ?

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Conostichoceras fast moving. I'd say not hardly. Quick reacting perhaps. Paleobiology database, from which the comment came, erroneously has almost any shelled cephalopod of any form or shape, nautiloid or ammonoid, as "fast moving". The statement should be ignored.

The strongly curved, expanded breviconic form of Conostichoceras would seem to suggest that it was a more leasurely bottom prowler, grubbing for prey along the sea floor. J.H.McDonnell (talk) 14:13, 15 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Reference Relevance

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

How do lesser known features of Lower Ordovician Ellesmerocerida (Kroger 2007) relate to this, a Middle and Upper Devonian oncocerid genus. The reference doesn't seem relevant in this case. Also the DOI address is of limited use. J.H.McDonnell (talk) 15:41, 28 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

See page 570 in the ref, which I just accessed by following the DOI address. Martin (Smith609 – Talk) 16:05, 28 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Conostichoceras. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110719065505/http://museumu03.museumwww.naturkundemuseum-berlin.de/cgi-bin/bridge.pl?action=basicTaxonInfo&taxon_no=12992 to http://museumu03.museumwww.naturkundemuseum-berlin.de/cgi-bin/bridge.pl?action=basicTaxonInfo&taxon_no=12992

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:24, 12 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic