Talk:Conqueror
This article was nominated for deletion on 2007-04-19. The result of the discussion was Redirect to Conquest. |
This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
The contents of the The Conquerors page were merged into Conqueror on November 9, 2015. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Page of its own?
edit"Conqueror" could usefully use its own entry. I was looking for information on early fire engines, and entered the name of Ericson and Braithwaite's steam machine. And William I of England has Conqueror as a nickname. King Hildebrand 12:35, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
- I have my doubts about how credible a fire engine would be in this case. Catbag 02:40, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
- Take a look at the bottom section of conquest. Do you not think that's enough for it's own disambiguation page? Alex9788 21:21, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
- Seeing as no-one's responded here or at Talk:Conquest, I'm making the change. Alex9788 14:23, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
h4x0r in teh j00r comp00tor?
editWhat about adding information about the infamous hack attacks on the game? There is a lot of documentation on it in the forums and we can also include info on how the admins are fixing the vulnerabilities in the game. Catbag 02:40, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
Perhaps this should also be listed, as his "Emperor" series is listed under the "Emperor" disambiguation page[3]? 88.111.77.60 (talk) 16:36, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
In the Warhammer 40,000 Universe, it's a tank that occurs in several novels (including the infamous Gaunt's Ghosts series, by Dan Abnett). Rules and models exist for it's use, and it is a respected varient on the "Leeman Russ Battle Tank". Perhaps it should also be included? 88.111.77.60 (talk) 16:36, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
I don't really know much/anything about Warhammer 40,000, but this "Leeman Russ Battle Tank" doesn't have its own page, so I can't see any justification for making a page about a variant thereof. Let me know if I misunderstood you, Alex9788 (talk) 18:00, 26 January 2009 (UTC)