Talk:Conquest of Tunis (1535)

Latest comment: 8 months ago by 2601:140:4101:DA40:1D9C:E2FC:CBDC:A0CF in topic belligerents list

Other Conquests of Tunis in '71, '69, '74 and '34

edit

This article should be split into at least Conquest of Tunis (1534), Conquest of Tunis (1535), Conquest of Tunis (1569), Conquest of Tunis (1571) and Conquest of Tunis (1574).

For 1534:

"The Ottoman Empire took nominal control of the city in 1534 when Barbarossa Hayreddin captured it from the Hafsid Sultan, Mulai Hassan." -- Tunis

"The Ottoman troops, under the leadership of Hayreddin Barbarossa, appeared before the Bab El Jazira on 18 August 1534 pillaged the city." -- Tunis

For 1569:

"Confronting the difficulties previously encountered, the Ottoman Uluç Ali Reis, at the head of an army of janissaries and Kabyles retook Tunis in 1569." -- Tunis

For 1571:

"He accompanied Don John of Austria at the taking of Tunis in the following year [to the Battle of Lepanto]." -- Álvaro de Bazán

"However, following the Battle of Lepanto in 1571, the Spanish succeeded in retaking the city and re-establishing the Hafsid sovereign." -- Tunis

For 1574:

"The resulting protectorate lasted until the Ottomans retook Tunis in 1574." -- Tunis

"Following these conflicts, the city finally fell into Ottoman hands in August 1574." -- Tunis

"The Ottomans responded by recapturing the city in 1574." -- Conquest of Tunis (this comment is also inaccurate, as it ignores prior events)

(There is probably more information in other articles for all these)--189.102.200.171 (talk) 01:54, 23 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Conquest of Tunis (1535). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:44, 29 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

belligerents list

edit

the indenting suggests that Genova was part of the Holy Roman Empire. pietro151.29.25.24 (talk) 07:57, 15 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

It most definitely was. In 1600ish the Holy Roman emperor ruled in favor of Genoa in a succession despite with the Duke of savoy this in turn contributed to the first Genoese Savoyard war with Savoy acting as an anti imperial proxy of France who also often attacked Genoa but more because of France’s rivalry with Spain. 2601:140:4101:DA40:1D9C:E2FC:CBDC:A0CF (talk) 03:43, 15 February 2024 (UTC)Reply