Talk:Conservation-reliant species
 | A fact from Conservation-reliant species appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 2 March 2009, and was viewed approximately 684 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Graph
editThe graph cannot be read very well. It should be converted into a different format to improve readability. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 05:56, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
- File size has been increased from 659kb to 1.12 MB. Readability is improved.-Marcus (talk) 06:24, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
- I would prefer to see the graph redrawn using R (programming language) or some other programme. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 08:02, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
- I appreciate your constructive suggestions. Unfortunately I have no idea how to do programming. If you or someone else can do, that would be great. This graph is the best image possible to support the hook and most notable fact of the article. I agree a sharper graphic would be preferred.--Marcus (talk) 19:03, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
- I would prefer to see the graph redrawn using R (programming language) or some other programme. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 08:02, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
Worldwide view
editThis is a new wildlife management term, first published in a USFWS publication in 2006. Worldwide view has not yet developed. Term has not yet appeared in non-USA foreign authored publication.-Marcus (talk) 06:24, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
- The concept certainly does have worldwide relevance and applicability, hence I have included Indian Tiger case study, though taken from a publication with Canadian and USA authors.
- This should be mentioned in the article. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 08:02, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
- Good point, It's done.-Marcus (talk) 08:33, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
- This should be mentioned in the article. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 08:02, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
Broken image
editThe graph picture might have a broken link. Does anyone know what the matter is? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.225.24.167 (talk) 02:01, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
Requested move 16 February 2015
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved. Number 57 11:19, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
Conservation reliant species → Conservation-reliant species – Grammar (attributive compound adjective). 195.147.24.214 (talk) 14:11, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
- Support, speedily if possible Red Slash 20:34, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.