Talk:Conservation in Papua New Guinea

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Wikifying

edit

Thank you for this valuable report! However, sometimes it reads a bit like a report and not like an encyclopedia. E.g. the conclusion section. May need some reformulations to avoid "original publishing" suspicion. Unsigned comment by 90.27.129.137 17:40, 9 April 2008

Removed remaining OR bits. --Elekhh (talk) 03:02, 11 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Article name

edit

I suggest the article should be renamed to Conservation in Papua New Guinea to follow established naming conventions. --Elekhh (talk) 03:02, 11 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Environment Act change 2010

edit

In 2010 a group of citizens filed suit to prevent the Chinese-owned Ramu nickel mine from building a pipeline that would deposit mine waste into the ocean. The government responded by introducing amendments to the country’s Environment Act that would take away citizens' right to challenge government-sanctioned projects in court. In 2010 it was not signed yet as law.Human Rights Watch World Report 2011 pages 355-356 Watti Renew (talk) 12:55, 16 June 2011 (UTC) This amendment was reversed in January 2012, by Parliament under the then O'Neill-Namah Government [1]Reply

References

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Conservation in Papua New Guinea. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:01, 12 August 2017 (UTC)Reply