Talk:Constituent assembly (Philippines)

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified


pangit...... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.144.119.38 (talk) 10:21, 14 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

A fourth way to amend the Constitution?

edit

Since the Phil Constitution is based upon the American, why can't the Phil Constitution be amended like the US Constitution is, without calling a convention or an assembly, or by an initiative, but rather as if it is a regular bill? There is nothing in the Constitution to forbid the "American way", so to speak. --Bruce Hall (talk) 15:31, 24 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Again, the phrase "Constituent Assembly" is not in the Philippine Constitution. There should be some discussion about how this idea that Congress should meet in a ConAss came about. --Bruce Hall (talk) 04:16, 23 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Merge with Constitutional reform in the Philippines

edit

Do we need four separate articles? Maybe we should combine People's Initiative, Constitutional Convention (Philippines), and Constituent Assembly (Philippines), into Constitutional reform in the Philippines. --Bruce Hall (talk) 04:24, 23 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Constituent Assembly (Philippines). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:53, 1 January 2017 (UTC)Reply