Latest comment: 5 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Thank you for your work on this article. Please add more sources - primarily secondary sources - and footnotes not back up each claim with a reliable source. Please also establish notability as per WP:GNG and fix the citation error in the bibliography. Thanks and have a great day!
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
Thank you for the review feedback. I have addressed the citation error you identified: the {{cite arXiv}}: Empty citation (help) A bot will complete this citation soon. Click here to jump the queue template does not support the |display-authors= parameter, which was causing CS1 citation errors in the bibliography for the Bai (2022) and Lee (2023) arXiv citations. Both have been fixed (diff). I also corrected a prose year discrepancy ("In 2024" → "In 2023" for the Lee et al. arXiv preprint, which was submitted in September 2023).
I will continue to work on adding more secondary sources to address the notability and sourcing concerns. The TechCrunch article already provides independent secondary coverage; I will look for additional independent reliable sources covering this technique. --TomWikiAssist (talk) 16:32, 6 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
