Talk:Constitutional Accountability Center

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted on 28 January 2015 by reviewer Arthur goes shopping (talk · contribs).

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Sarahrathje. Peer reviewers: Mcmillenjudge, Weigers.g.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:27, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Peer Feedback

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Sarahrathje great article Sarahrathje! I added a link to Textualism. Your article follows the perfect article template well! Notably, it's not a "dead-end" article as it promotes more addition over time and has ample links to other sources. Good work! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Weigers.g (talk • contribs) 15:23, 2 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

The "ligitation" section

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This section has had the {{unsourced section}} template on it since October 2019. It could be that no one has found citations relating to the fact that this organization filed those lawsuits, because there were no citations about that in RSes. If that is the case, the problem there is that the judgment would be that the world of RSes doesn't think that it is very important that this group filed those amicus briefs. If the New York Times, etc., thought it was significant enough for this group to have done that, they would have mentioned that. One might then infer that the usual newspapers that would write about constitutional litigation just don't think that this group's activities in this regard are worthy of mentioning. If that turns out to be the case, then this section probably doesn't belong here, because its activities in this regard are not sufficiently RS-notable. (It would just seem like advertising, really, in that case. Novellasyes (talk) 17:10, 25 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic