Talk:Construction of Queensland railways
The contents of the 11 separate railway systems page were merged into Construction of Queensland railways on March 11th 2014. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
11 separate railway systems
editSuggest that 11 separate railway systems article be merged with this article. DCB1927 (talk) 18:35, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
- I agree with you. It may create too long an article, but in that case, the individual lines can be split out into their own article (a number already have their own article) but it certainly makes sense to have a single history of the development of the railway network in Queensland, not two. Kerry (talk) 21:26, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Construction of Queensland railways. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080722120309/http://www.ipswich.qld.gov.au/documents/heritage/grandchester.pdf to http://www.ipswich.qld.gov.au/documents/heritage/grandchester.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:46, 12 August 2017 (UTC)