The contents of the Contectopalatus page were merged into Phalarodon on 20 July 2024 and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history.
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Contectopalatus redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Contectopalatus is part of WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, an effort to make Wikipedia a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource for amphibians and reptiles. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Amphibians and ReptilesWikipedia:WikiProject Amphibians and ReptilesTemplate:WikiProject Amphibians and Reptilesamphibian and reptile articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Latest comment: 3 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Maisch & Matzke (1998) named the new genus Contectopalatus for what was previously known as Mixosaurus atavus. They continued to use it in their following publications (i.e., Maisch & Matzke (2000), Masich & Matzke (2001), Maisch (2010)), Brinkmann (2004) also accepted it as valid. However, other ichthyosaur workers tended to keep it sunk into Mixosaurus (i.e., Sander (2000), McGowan & Motani (2003)). Jiang et al. (2005) treated Contectopalatus as distinct, but soon after, the same team, minus Maisch and Matzke (and plus Schmitz), assigned the species to Phalarodon as P. atavus (Jiang et al. (2006)). The two most recent publications on the taxon, Liu et al. (2013) and Engelschiøn et al. (2023), both refer to it as P. atavus, the latter, not involving the authors of the original synonymy, features a (brief) discussion of mixosaurid systematics that doesn't even mention Contectopalatus, despite noting the similar issue of Barracudasauroides. The two major ichthyosaur phylogeny papers of the modern age are Ji et al. (2016) and Moon (2017), the former of which has P. atavus within Phalarodon, the latter of which has it labeled as Contectopalatus on the cladograms, though neither discuss their decisions. The only recent usage of Contectopalatus as a valid genus in prose in the technical literature that I have found is in Fischer et al. (2021), where it's just a passing mention (conversely, it also gets referred to as P. atavus in passing in other papers, i.e., Zverkov et al. (2022)). Therefore, given that P. atavus generally seems to have wider acceptance than C. atavus, and is used by two different sets of authors focusing on this species (or at least something very similar), I think it would be pertinent to merge our Contectopalatus article into the Phalarodon article (which, of additional note, has already been written treating Contectopalatus as a synonym of Phalarodon. --Slate Weasel [Talk - Contribs] 22:24, 28 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 14:38, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
