Talk:Continental fragment

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 August 2021 and 7 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): N8mitchell. Peer reviewers: Jeartis17.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 18:24, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Japanese archipelago

Is Japanese archipelago a microcontinent? It is not listed. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 09:33, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

[1]. Search for Kurosegawa in other sources. — kwami (talk) 10:46, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Continental fragment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131111152542/http://www.aemnp.eu/PDF/52_s2/52_s2_1.pdf to http://www.aemnp.eu/PDF/52_s2/52_S2_1.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:07, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Zealandia as a Microcontinent

Where is the source for this claim. As far as I am aware the classification of Zealandia as a Continent or Micro-continent is still a hotly debated issue with no firm decision reached in either case. Also, the link to utexas.edu is dead. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.242.9.239 (talk • contribs) 16:47, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

Evaluation of Sources

All three articles have useful information, graphics, and data relevant to my topic. In all the articles, the citations got distracting. It would be mid-sentence, and there would be a giant gap filled with a citation until the sentence picked up again. Specifically, in the Nemcok article, the jargon and vocabulary was difficult for someone who does not have a background in the topic to follow. All the information is up to date since all the articles are less than 20 years old, and the process of continents fragmenting takes quite a bit of time (more than 20 years). Between the articles (for a total of 80 pages), I think there is more than enough information. In the Tetreault article, the information is presented the best as it is accurate and clear. The other two articles could use a little less jargon, but other than that, the information is accurate and useful. The article's do not have links to other Wikipedia pages, but they reference numerous other sources. N8mitchell (talk) 17:39, 15 October 2021 (UTC)