Talk:Contributions to Philosophy

Philosophy: Literature / Continental / Contemporary Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophical literature
	Continental philosophy
	Contemporary philosophy

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Ereignis

Latest comment: 12 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

"Ereignis" means "event," "occurrence," "incident," or "happening." What's with this "Enowning"? It seems to be a neologism that does not designate any concept.Lestrade (talk) 02:37, 16 October 2010 (UTC)LestradeReply

Not any concept you'd encounter outside of Heidegger, sure. Read the book before you take issue with its choices in translation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.28.7.118 (talk) 03:29, 18 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

I think that its important to read the translators notes before you dive into the book, otherwise the depth of meaning in the neologism will be lost on you. Antenarrative (talk) 07:15, 30 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

New Translation

Latest comment: 9 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

A new translation of this work was recently released with the title Contributions to Philosophy (of the Event). It is regarded by many in the Heideggerian community as far superior to the Emad-Maly translation. We need to retitle this Wikipedia page as "Contributions to Philosophy" with a mention in the article of the full German title and the two different English translations. Hurvashtahumvata888 (talk) 15:39, 1 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Then go ahead. ImprovingWiki (talk) 21:26, 1 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

How do I go about changing the title heading? I've changed the info in the article but the title still says "Contributions to Philosophy: From Enowning). Hurvashtahumvata888 (talk) 02:44, 12 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

No sources

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This is probably H.'s most difficult book. Unfair to the reader to ask that they accept a "summary" by an anonymous editor who may or may not know what's up.

Without sources, material should be deleted as "OR," although I don't propose to personally do so. There are at least two books and numerous articles that treat the work in some detail. Any Wikipedia article that goes beyond bare publication details needs to be sourced. 2600:1702:39A0:3720:F901:118:52F9:14B8 (talk) 16:49, 3 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Add topic