Talk:Controversies surrounding the Society of Saint Pius X
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Controversies surrounding the Society of Saint Pius X article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
This topic contains controversial issues, some of which have reached a consensus for approach and neutrality, and some of which may be disputed. Before making any potentially controversial changes to the article, please carefully read the discussion-page dialogue to see if the issue has been raised before, and ensure that your edit meets all of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Please also ensure you use an accurate and concise edit summary. |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Untitled
editI just removed a section from the article whose entire contents were:
- In the United States, the Society has been accused of spreading allegedly fascist, un-American political ideas, and undermining American patriotism.[1][2]
I removed it for several reasons. First, it is full of peakock terms---it does tell you who made the allegations, what they were, or why. Second, reading the source, I have to say it is anything but reliable. It is almost 17 years old and is more of a position piece of the author as compared to a reliabel source. Do I believe the allegations might be true? Yes. Can I accept the vagueness of the above statement as true? No. Can I accept the sources provided? Definitely not. Before reinserting please provide valid sources along with specifics.---Balloonman NO! I'm Spartacus! 14:27, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
References
The above link is broken, here's the article in Wayback Machine: Thomas W. Case: The Society of St. Pius X Gets Sick
And a more recent article (May 2020) on similar subjects, by Dr John R. Lamont: SSPX and Infiltration of Sex Abusers Spoutn1k (talk) 12:26, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
RfC
editAn RfC: Which descriptor, if any, can be added in front of Southern Poverty Law Center when referenced in other articles? has been posted at the Southern Poverty Law Center talk page. Your participation is welcomed. – MrX 16:37, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Controversies surrounding the Society of St. Pius X. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.catholicnews.com/data/stories/cns/1204487.htm - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928040757/http://www.angelusonline.org/print.php?sid=831 to http://www.angelusonline.org/print.php?sid=831
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:01, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Controversies surrounding the Society of St. Pius X. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090517064804/http://sspx.ca/Communicantes/Aug2001/French/Itineraire_spirituel.htm to http://www.sspx.ca/Communicantes/Aug2001/French/Itineraire_spirituel.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090131204720/http://www.sspxseminary.org/publications/letter/1991/February/February.shtml to http://www.sspxseminary.org/publications/letter/1991/February/February.shtml
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090216084151/http://svtplay.se/v/1413831/webbextra_langre_intervju_med_williamson to http://svtplay.se/v/1413831/webbextra_langre_intervju_med_williamson
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090202092837/http://ncrcafe.org/node/2382 to http://ncrcafe.org/node/2382
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081003081932/http://qien.free.fr/2007/200701/20070128_chiron.htm to http://qien.free.fr/2007/200701/20070128_chiron.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:41, 12 August 2017 (UTC)