Talk:Controversy over the discovery of Haumea/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
This article is a quick fail. It has dispute tags on it, POV tags, and its accuracy is being questioned. There is an argument underway on the article's talk page.

Final GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): Well written b (MoS): Follows MoS

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): Well referenced b (citations to reliable sources): Sources are reliable c (OR): No OR

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): Sets the context b (focused): Remains focused on subject

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias: NPOV

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Article is a quick fail because of current edit wars over NPOV. —Mattisse (Talk) 03:50, 11 February 2009 (UTC)