Talk:Convention Parliament (England)
Latest comment: 17 years ago by Wetman in topic Untitled
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Convention Parliament (England) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 2 months |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editI thought the defining feature of a Convention Parliament is that is not summoned by the Crown but by some alternate authority, such as the senior prince of the blood royal or the previous revolutionary government. J S Ayer 03:00, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
- These "Addled Parliament"-type titles are not only retardataire they aren't even very useful, as in this case. I was simply looking for the Parliament of 1689. Isn't that the best title? --Wetman 06:10, 12 February 2007 (UTC)