Talk:Convergent beam electron diffraction

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 21 January 2022 by reviewer Robert McClenon (talk · contribs).

Physics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Materials Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Materials, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Materials on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MaterialsWikipedia:WikiProject MaterialsTemplate:WikiProject MaterialsMaterials articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Small part copied to Electron diffraction

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Not much in it which is probably enough.

I also wonder why there is no further reading, for instance Spence & Zuo, or more advanced topics such as HOLZ, GM lines, charge refinement etc. I suggest adding something along those lines in a short section. Ldm1954 (talk) 16:01, 9 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Notes

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

For User:Koogid, as I don't want to be duplicate editing and you may already have these:

Bernard Buxton worked for John Steeds, and John took the work much further so I think should be referenced.
4D STEM is CBED at 0.2nm, so the 100nm for CBED is ancient. There is the much earlier work of John Cowley and also John Spence
John Steeds' coherent STEM is the father of 4D
There are a couple of nice montages from Nestor in Electron diffraction you might want to use, and a few other references
Remember that the discs are only roughly at "Bragg" positions

Ldm1954 (talk) 15:06, 30 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for valuable remarks. It would be great if you could add that information into the article. Koogid (talk) 16:08, 30 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic