Talk:Convoy Faith/GA1
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Nick-D in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Ealdgyth - Talk 16:19, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
I'll be reviewing this article shortly. Ealdgyth - Talk 16:19, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
- Lead:
- Should there be a link of some sort for convoy?
- Background:
- Do we have a link for the luftwaffe unit? Should it be redlinked?
- Those are just suggestions, however, and I'm going ahead and passing this article. Ealdgyth - Talk 16:28, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review - I've just made those changes you suggested. Cheers, Nick-D (talk) 09:29, 10 January 2011 (UTC)